Government should spend money on railways rahter than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

The question of whether people in authority, ought to invest funds in rail line construction and maintenance,
instead
of the
road
transport
system, has sparked a substantial debate.
While
many contend against
this
, others advocate for it, because it ensures faster commutes,
as well as
reduces traffic congestion, and I firmly agree with the latter idea. Analyzing these facts will give a comprehensive overview of the subject matter.
Firstly
, travelling on a speed train is a faster means of
transport
, which would enable people to arrive at their destination on time.
For instance
, travelling from Greater Sudbury to Toronto is about 7 hours by bus.
However
, commuting by rail line reduces
this
trip by 4 hours. Clearly,
this
is not a speed that
road
transit could match.
Therefore
, one of the reasons governments need to invest more in railway construction.
Secondly
, railways eliminate gridlock in busy cities. Normally, most people staying in suburban parts of the could have been stuck in the traffic.
For example
, I usually arrive at work late regardless of how early I leave my house, but since the railway was installed three months ago, I now arrive early, even when I am a few minutes behind my schedule. Obviously, gridlock issues are not a challenge
road
transportation could tackle.
Thus
, one of the reasons the government must invest in the train
transport
system. In conclusion, the issues surrounding whether the government should fund the construction of train
transport
systems, in place of
road
transportation, have prompted a considerable dispute. Some refute
this
idea,
whereas
others champion it,
due to
reduced commuting time and minimized traffic jams in big cities. I completely support the
later
Correct your spelling
latter
show examples
standpoint. Examining
this
factuality has given you an extensive understanding of
this
topic.
Submitted by Eby on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Expand on the range of examples and the depth of analysis in your arguments to provide a more nuanced and comprehensive response to the essay prompt.
coherence and cohesion
Incorporate a greater variety of linking words and phrases to better connect ideas and paragraphs, enhancing the flow of the essay.
task achievement
Consider including a counter-argument to showcase your ability to engage with differing viewpoints, thereby enriching the complexity of your essay.
coherence and cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central idea, supported by specific examples or explanations, to strengthen coherence and cohesion.
coherence and cohesion
Revise the introduction and conclusion to more clearly reflect your thesis statement and summarize the main points of your argument, respectively.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • sustainable development
  • transportation infrastructure
  • urban mobility
  • decongesting
  • emissions
  • economic growth
  • remote regions
  • modernization
  • reliable alternative
  • public safety
  • pollution
  • tourism
  • facilitating access
  • infrastructure investment
  • balanced approach
What to do next:
Look at other essays: