Is it better to live in a small or a big city? Give reasons and examples to support you answer.

The discussion of whether individuals ought to live in a large town or in a small one has sparked substantial deliberation.

While

some advocate for residing in a developed

city

, because it holds numerous job prospects, others contend it, arguing for living in a smaller town,

due to

having untampered vegetation. Analyzing these facts would give a comprehensive understanding of

this

subject matter. On the one hand, developed cities provide enormous job opportunities since companies are concentrated around these areas.

For instance

, a survey, from my recently concluded capstone project shows that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

residents of a big

city

are 75% more likely to be employed within a month than their counterparts. Clearly,

this

is an employment possibility only large cities can offer.

Therefore

, it is apparent that living in a large state is more favourable.

On the other hand

, smaller towns still have an untampered ecosystem which has not been damaged by industrialization.

For example

, I chose to reside in Greater Sudbury because of the reserved environment which is free from industrial pollution. Obviously,

such

a preserved ecosystem would solely be found in a small community.

Hence

,

it is clear that

individuals are better off living in a small

city

. In conclusion, the dialogue on whether individuals ought to stay in a big

city

or a small one has prompted a considerable dispute. Many champion that life in a big

city

is better,

due to

massive job opportunities, others, refute it, highlighting that the eco-friendliness of a small state makes it a better option. Examining both standpoints has given an extensive overview of

this

topic.