Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.

Some individuals believe it is best to have
friends
who
share
the same opinions,
while
others say it is better to have some who do not believe in the same matters.
This
essay discusses both sides and explains why I agree with the first group. Many believe it is better to be in a social group that agrees on the same ideas all the time. The main reason for
this
is because it prevents arguing and conflicts. By agreeing with each other, people can have more peaceful and fruitful conversations.
For instance
, my
friends
and I usually enjoy chatting casually about light-hearted subjects, rather than arguing with each other.
Additionally
, having
friends
who
share
the same beliefs provides a closer bond.
This
is
due to
them seeing others as part of themselves, and
therefore
, treasuring and taking better care of their relationship.
However
, others feel that it is better to have
friends
who
share
the same beliefs.
This
is because it might promote personal growth within the group. When
friends
expose different opinions, individuals have the opportunity to learn something new and sometimes change their ideals.
For example
, colleagues who do not
share
the same religion might discuss their beliefs' differences and similarities.
Moreover
, hearing different points of view makes individuals go out of their intellectual comfort zone.
This
is
due to
learning a wider variety of perspectives related to the subject, and
therefore
, expanding one's knowledge about it. In conclusion, I believe both sides of the argument have merits.
However
,
overall
, I think the advantages of having light-hearted chats and developing a stronger bond outweigh the disadvantages of sometimes being stuck on the same ideas and having a limited perspective on a subject.
Furthermore
, in my opinion, different ideas and opinions can be acquired by talking to family members and work colleagues.
Submitted by amandacflago23 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Try to provide more detailed examples to support your points. Specific examples make your argument stronger.
task achievement
Consider presenting contrasting views more clearly. Although you discussed both sides, ensuring that each viewpoint is explored in detail and balanced can enhance your response.
task achievement
Maintain consistency in your argument. There was a slight inconsistency when you mentioned agreeing with the first group, but later discussed the benefits of the second view without a clear stance.
coherence and cohesion
Use a variety of linking words to connect ideas more smoothly and show the relationships between paragraphs and sentences.
coherence and cohesion
You provided a well-structured essay with a clear introduction and conclusion.
task achievement
Your essay demonstrates your ability to discuss both sides of the argument.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • bond
  • support
  • unconditional love
  • shared values
  • mutual understanding
  • trust
  • emotional well-being
  • interdependence
  • societal norms
  • companionship
  • loyalty
  • advice
  • experiences
  • mentorship
  • trustworthy
  • reliable
  • reliable
  • cherish
  • strengthen
  • deepen
  • attach importance to
  • prioritize
What to do next:
Look at other essays: