Students at schools and the university learn far more from lessons with the teachers than from other source (such as internet and television). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that lessons which are given by teachers are more useful for
students
rather than video lectures of modern technological sources. I unequivocally agree with this
statement because classroom teaching fosters problem-solving skills in pupils , and it is an active reception of content.
The first reason for my agreement is that technology-based teaching does not enable offspring to build critical thinking as traditional teaching methods not only develop critical skills but also
build problem-solving skills in juveniles. This
is because learning in a classroom setting enables juveniles to conquer a number of problems at a time and students
try to find solutions to these problems in a short while
under the guidance of mentors which is not possible in the case of the internet and television resources. For instance
, there is an artificial intelligence teacher launched in the market, which plays a significant role in explaining the basic concept of studies to pupils, however
, in case offspring have doubts about studies this
invention is unable to serve the purpose.
A further
reason is that curriculum-based learning involves active delivery of content by a teacher which is in other cases delivered passively where there is no face-to-face interaction at all. It is a well-known fact that giving lessons at schools and colleges is only possible with the help of teachers because there is not any gizmo which replaces them. Howbeit, online sources at alma
mater deliver lectures in a passive mode which is not able to provide them feedback when they are asking for something. Correct pronoun usage
my alma
For example
, the XYZ YouTube channel provides mathematics coaching to students
, and there are various numerical illustrations to guide them in solving issues. On the other hand
, when offspring initiate to sort out problems on their own, they face complications.
In conclusion, I strongly support the opinion that the classroom environment assists students
to learn in a better and greater way as compared than
taking guidance from television and the Internet because developing a skill to solve hurdles is only possible with strict teacher guidance and one can actively receive content without any obstruction.Change preposition
to
Submitted by Kirandeepkaur on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Coherence & Cohesion
Ensure variety in sentence structure to enhance clarity and flow of your ideas. Experiment with complex and compound sentences.
Lexical resource
Try to incorporate a wider range of vocabulary to better express nuanced ideas and opinions. Avoid repetition of words where possible.
Task Achievement
While providing examples, make sure they clearly support your main points. It will strengthen your argument and clarity.
Grammatical range and accuracy
Be mindful of minor grammatical errors and strive for accuracy to enhance the overall quality of your writing.
Introduction & Conclusion
You effectively introduced and concluded your essay, providing a clear opinion on the topic.
Use of Examples
Your use of relevant examples, such as the artificial intelligence teacher and the XYZ YouTube channel, effectively supports your arguments.
Logical Structure
You maintain a logical flow of ideas through well-structured paragraphs, which aids understanding and engagement.