Ever since industrialization has become the key sector in any country, some people think that taxes should be higher than others because they pollute the environment significantly,
while
others argue that there is another solution to tackle it. Whilst acknowledging that there are a few solutions other than increasing tax, I think the former idea is more beneficial than the latter ones.
Environmental contamination is essential in all countries, and the majority of pollution is a result of industrialization. Linking Words
Therefore
, some experts advise that the high tax policy can solve the issues. Because they believe that funds collected through taxes would be spent for the rehabilitation of the ecology. Linking Words
This
is the most effective way to manage environmental deterioration with full accessibility and control. Linking Words
For example
, in some countries, the government agent selects the companies that perform and are responsible for assessing the contamination and cultivation of trees and plants. Linking Words
Such
projects are Linking Words
then
financed by business owners through taxation.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, it can't be neglected that there are other methods to handle Linking Words
this
problem, Linking Words
such
as making the companies' operations more eco-friendly and pushing them to improve their technologies. Linking Words
However
, Linking Words
this
approach may bring certain advantages to companies and countries in the long run, which might take much time, effort, and investment to fulfil all requirements, including technologies, policies, and regulations.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
there are better ways to deal with industrial pollution, Linking Words
such
as involving new technologies and initiatives, imposing a higher financial charge on manufacturers would be the best and fastest approach to collecting and distributing the funds for solving ecological and economic problems to restore and protect nature.Linking Words
ms2002aq