Many people believe that formal 'pen and paper' examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement. What is your view of examinations? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Nowadays, most schools and teaching institutions use paper-based

exams

to qualify the learning capacity and intelligence of the

students

.

Therefore

,

this

method brings a special concern regarding the efficacy and reliability of the examinations to assess

students

' capabilities. I would like to start my argument by writing about the importance of the examinations. People who are in favour of

this

method believe that, after teaching each subject, pupils should be assessed to determine how effective was the course and how much

students

learn from the subject. They claim that paper-based tests are the best way because

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

all the

students

will be examined in the same and fair condition.

Moreover

, high-quality

exams

consist of different types of questions

such

as multiple-choice and essay tasks that give test-takers almost enough information about each individual student.

On the contrary

, people who oppose

this

kind of assessment argue that

students

have different intellectual capacities and they should not be judged merely by taking paper

exams

.

For instance

, some of the

students

perform much better on group tasks, some have the ability to manage a team, and, some have better research skills.

Thus

, other types of evaluation techniques should

also

be considered.

For example

, group projects to determine teamwork ability or writing an essay to measure independent learning. To summarize, based on what is mentioned above, in my opinion, the role of formal pen and paper

exams

in assessing

students

' learning is undeniable. But,

in addition

to that, other forms of evaluations should be applied.