Nowadays, most schools and teaching institutions use paper-based
exams
to qualify the learning capacity and intelligence of the Use synonyms
students
. Use synonyms
Therefore
, Linking Words
this
method brings a special concern regarding the efficacy and reliability of the examinations to assess Linking Words
students
' capabilities.
I would like to start my argument by writing about the importance of the examinations. People who are in favour of Use synonyms
this
method believe that, after teaching each subject, pupils should be assessed to determine how effective was the course and how much Linking Words
students
learn from the subject. They claim that paper-based tests are the best way becauseUse synonyms
,
all the Remove the comma
apply
students
will be examined in the same and fair condition. Use synonyms
Moreover
, high-quality Linking Words
exams
consist of different types of questions Use synonyms
such
as multiple-choice and essay tasks that give test-takers almost enough information about each individual student.
Linking Words
On the contrary
, people who oppose Linking Words
this
kind of assessment argue that Linking Words
students
have different intellectual capacities and they should not be judged merely by taking paper Use synonyms
exams
. Use synonyms
For instance
, some of the Linking Words
students
perform much better on group tasks, some have the ability to manage a team, and, some have better research skills. Use synonyms
Thus
, other types of evaluation techniques should Linking Words
also
be considered. Linking Words
For example
, group projects to determine teamwork ability or writing an essay to measure independent learning.
To summarize, based on what is mentioned above, in my opinion, the role of formal pen and paper Linking Words
exams
in assessing Use synonyms
students
' learning is undeniable. But, Use synonyms
in addition
to that, other forms of evaluations should be applied.Linking Words
bryan.dasco