A global warming summit is held regularly by various countries concerned with the issue. Do you think this will benefit the effort of overcoming it? Explain your reasons.
Nowadays, a climate change issue has been determined as a paramount challenge, which relates to the environmental deterioration coming about in all nations around the world.
Consequently
, a superb seminar about it is frequently going to be carried out that tends to solve the formidable problem. My take on this
, I partially see eye to eye with the statement due to
no effort after that.
On the one hand, some proponents positively believe that the event is possibly able to engage numerous powerful countries, which are on the same page in a captivating action to diminish the global warming problem. Lately, the obstacle has been posted and discussed by over 85% of nations around the world that ended up with a stunning collaboration plan. For instance
, Russia is certainly going to provide the financial requirements, while
it coincides with European countries allocating all genius researchers to look into the issue.
On the other hand
, I individually contemplate that there are no down-to-earth approaches after the agenda is done. It is noticeable that the workshop truly is a run-of-the-mill activity, which only produces a manuscript tailored to the issue at the of the day. Case in point, the habitat issues conference that was set up in Indonesia could only publish a paper in a prestigious journal without taking action and going the extra mile. Therefore
, the global warming summit is an exceptional meeting; however
, it is always unable to initiate a real step.
To sum up
, besides
, the event plays a significant role in global warming, but it is required to be gone over completely taking into account the real operation. As a result
, from my point of view, I am on the fence about the situation.Submitted by soniandriawan1992 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Content and Development
While your essay presents a clear position and is well-structured, try to ensure a more balanced development of ideas in both body paragraphs. Although you've effectively covered positives and negatives, a more equal elaboration on each might strengthen your argument.
Coherence and Cohesion
Work on a more varied range of connectives and cohesive devices to link ideas more smoothly within and between paragraphs, enhancing readability and flow. This will elevate your coherence score.
Task Response
Consider refining your conclusion to more decisively reflect your viewpoint, as it currently appears somewhat ambivalent. A stronger, clearer stance in the conclusion could make your argument more compelling.
Structure
Your essay is commendably structured with a clear introduction, body paragraphs addressing positives and negatives, and a conclusion. This organizational skill is pivotal for high-scoring essays.
Use of Examples
You provided specific examples to support your claims, such as the collaboration between Russia and European countries and the conference in Indonesia. This approach adds credibility and depth to your argument.
Clarity of Position
Your position on the issue is clear, and you've effectively communicated your perspective throughout the essay. This is key in satisfying the task achievement criterion.