In today's society, developing countries are giving encouragement provided by institutions to other nations.
While
it is widely believed that financial support is necessary, others argue that practical aid is more effective. Linking Words
This
essay will discuss these opposing views. I firmly believe that countries should be given the practical method, as it prevents governments from taking the funds provided.
On the one hand, it is argued that financial help is more advantageous to undeveloped countries. As it is to escape one's country from poverty and major problems. Linking Words
For instance
, Sudan is currently having health and sanitation issues. By giving money to Linking Words
this
country, it can help them tackle the areas that need to be addressed.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, I believe that practical advice is more beneficial for undeveloped nations. It is mainly because the money given by organizations can be misused by governments and may not be Linking Words
according to
the target. Linking Words
For example
, Sudan lacks an educational system. The developed country could invest in supplies of books and school essentials. Linking Words
Therefore
, it is directly solving the problem. Linking Words
Although
financial subsidy is Linking Words
also
helpful in some aspects, considering that the corrupt government may use Linking Words
this
money for their own sake, it is better to use practice assistance as it is more targeted.
In conclusion, Linking Words
while
it is commonly thought that financial benefit is an effective way to support poor nations, others believe that practical help is essential. Personally, I believe that practical aid is more advantageous in tackling problems from the roots.Linking Words
yohanatheresia98