Countless discoveries in scientific fields could have been successful
due to
a pre-clinical examination of living things. Linking Words
Hence
, it is widely considered that animal tests are necessary for people. Linking Words
However
, some strongly support animal rights. In my opinion, Linking Words
this
step of scientific research should be banned. Linking Words
This
essay will evaluate the reasons for my statement and suggest alternatives .
First of all, the treatment that animals receive during research is poor. Scientific institutions argue that they treat animals with respect and that they have ethical guidelines that should be followed. But the reality is not. Rats, rabbits, or monkeys are locked in small cages and they are barely fed. Linking Words
Furthermore
, they have to suffer from pain and other health issues when they are injected with new chemicals. I saw a documentary that presents monkeys with mental diseases after a long time living in cages inside a lab. As Linking Words
such
, I argue that it is inappropriate for humans to consider other living creatures as tools for them.
Linking Words
Then
, what can scientists do to replace Linking Words
this
brutal method? As technologies developed exponentially, people found a way to test newly discovered substances with computers. There are some companies which already adopted Linking Words
this
method. A shampoo company manufactured a new merchant and had to undergo a clinical test before going out to the market. The company did not follow a traditional procedure, but they created an artificial skin tissue of a human with a computer. Eventually, the company effectively proved the safety of their new product. Like Linking Words
this
, the world should constantly seek alternatives.
Linking Words
To sum up
, it is selfish for the public to let Linking Words
this
brutal circumstance take place just for their comfort. Scientists should develop existing replacements and Linking Words
also
look for others, too.Linking Words
yelim050319