Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The atmospheric
pollution is a major topic of concern in the context of globalization. Some people argue that Correct article usage
Atmospheric
car-free
days
should be encouraged globally as an effective method of lessening air
pollution. Although
this
is undeniably true, air
degradation can be minimized more successfully by other methods.
On the one hand, the organization of car-free
days
has appealed a plenty of advocates due to
its temporary feasibility, contributing significantly to the ubiquity of public transport and physical activities such
as walking or cycling just in a short period. As a result
, this
solution might enhance people's awareness of alleviating environmental issues and reducing the momentary amount of traffic emissions. However
, the idea of car-free
days
is considered a one-sided strategy since it does not minimize the other exhaust fumes being released from the industrial factories which poses a serious threat to air
contamination. Furthermore
, the benefits of this
method are typically short-term because they are not implemented regularly, so the reduction of emissions is not enough to make changes in pollution levels.
On the other hand
, I suppose that there are more multifaceted solutions to tackle this
problem. The first possible way is the promotion of green transportation. Offering environmentally friendly public modes of transport such
as electric buses, trams, subways, etc can help to limit personal vehicles in rush hours and it has a positive impact on minimizing traffic congestion rather than car-free
days
. For example
, many countries like Japan, Korea
,... have subway networks for commuters to move to their workplace or other areas, resulting in clean Correct word choice
and Korea
air
quality and less car dependency. This
will ultimately lead to lessening fossil fuel usage and improving the ecosystem.
To sum up
, I contend that the international car-free
days
may have little result in the atmospheric problem. However
, other solutions, namely promoting public transport and using green energy, are worth more concernSubmitted by phamnhung275 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Achievement
It's commendable how your essay provides a balanced view by discussing both sides of the argument before presenting your own perspective. To further enhance your task achievement, ensure that your opinion is stated more clearly in the introduction, making it evident throughout the essay.
Coherence & Cohesion
For better coherence and cohesion, try using a wider range of linking phrases and topic sentences that clearly signal the main idea of each paragraph. This will help your essay flow more seamlessly from one idea to the next.
Logical Structure
You've done well in structuring your essay with a clear introduction, body paragraphs that discuss each view, and a concise conclusion that restates your opinion.
Supported Main Points
Your essay effectively uses examples and explanations to support your main points, which enhances the overall argument and makes your reasoning clear.
Complete Response
Your ability to discuss the efficacy of car-free days versus promoting public transport and using green energy provides a comprehensive response to the prompt, showing a good understanding of the topic.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?
