Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources rather than in building a larger collection of paper books. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

With the advancements made in technology, there has been a change in people’s reading habits. It is generally believed that libraries’ focus should be on the development of technological resources
instead
of enlarging the collection of printed
sources
. I totally disagree with
this
for two main reasons. One of the reasons why I disagree is that a reduction in the production of paper
books
can leave the originality of the work at risk. Printed
books
not only contain information about a specific sphere or topic
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
but
also
, reflect the culture and the era they are produced. They can give a sense of the designs
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
or the materials used for
books
by publishers of the time, which might arouse enthusiasm in readers as they can touch and feel
while
reading. Take manuscripts as examples, which are often admired by fans because of the authenticity of the content that has never been changed by other authors.
Hence
, copying them into a digital form can impact the reputation of libraries where rare
sources
are often believed to be kept in physical form.
However
, I admit that modern ways of preserving materials can create certain advantages like compressed files, minimal space, and expenses.
However
Add a comma
However,
show examples
the convenience and portability of physical
sources
make libraries popular among the users where they can feel these. They can check the
books
out and use them at home
according to
personal timetables or
due to
the compact size they can even take them to places where they are truly free and comfortable.
In contrast
, electronic
sources
are not always allowed to be copied or used outside the library premises.
Moreover
, online
books
cause more harm to human health than their physical counterparts, which can especially be seen in the deterioration of eyesight because of excessive screen time. In conclusion,
although
a few benefits are possible through the development of technological resources, I fully disagree that
this
should be at the cost of
sources
in printed forms.
Submitted by hamzayevasamina on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Include more diverse connecting devices to enhance the flow between sentences and paragraphs.
task achievement
Try to present counterarguments more clearly to enhance the balance of your essay and demonstrate thorough consideration of the topic.
task achievement
Consider incorporating direct examples from contemporary or historical contexts to strengthen your argument.
task achievement
The essay successfully introduces the topic and provides a clear opinion, which is consistent throughout the text.
coherence cohesion
You provided a logical structure that helps readers follow your argument with clear paragraphing.
coherence cohesion
Your examples, such as the value of manuscripts and the physical experience of reading books, effectively support your main points.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: