The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizen’s health rather than on protecting the environment.Do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversial perspective heating a debate over the fact that the government should allocate more financial resources to medical

research

instead

of environmental protection. In my

opinion

Add a comma

opinion,

show examples

I do not consider myself an advocate of

this

idea. Without a shadow of a doubt, Both medical

research

and environmental conservation are equally important to human

health

. Throughout history, people have had to deal with various effects of environmental degradation, some of which threatened the

life

Fix the agreement mistake

lives

show examples

of entire populations. We have been forced to battle illnesses that have the potential to destroy entire countries' medical systems. People's susceptibility to these risks cannot be measured. If they were to be addressed, significant government spending would be required.

Furthermore

, preserving the environment is a crucial part of protecting human

health

. It is true that supporting medical

research

activities is the most effective strategy to cure the numerous terrible diseases that are now creating so many issues throughout the world,

such

as Covid 19. In actuality, we are dealing with a number of major

health

issues caused by environmental contamination.

For example

, excessive levels of air and water pollution are causing a rise in cancer cases and death tolls. Extreme weather conditions generated by global warming are

also

one of the main factors behind the deterioration of human

health

. In conclusion,

although

medical

research

is undoubtedly necessary and should be properly funded, I disagree that it should get more funding from the government than environmental preservation.