One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether the state should be responsible for people's well-being and
education
or not. In Use synonyms
this
essay, the idea of the first group, which aims to achieve more success for each Linking Words
society
, and the second perspective, emphasizing inevitable consequences for the community, will be discussed.
Given the fact that the largest investor in any Use synonyms
society
is its Use synonyms
government
, advocates argue that the Use synonyms
government
should invest in Use synonyms
education
and medical care. Use synonyms
Therefore
, Linking Words
this
investment not only promotes physical and mental health within Linking Words
society
but Use synonyms
also
reduces illiteracy rates. Linking Words
For example
, Japan's Linking Words
government
's focus on literacy and healthcare has led to educational and economic advancements in the country. Simply put, the healthier the Use synonyms
society
, the more successful it will be.
Opponents, Use synonyms
however
, argue that the is unnecessary for the state to invest in health care and Linking Words
education
, the most significant of which is economic depression. Simply put, If the Use synonyms
government
spends the money Use synonyms
that is
in the treasury on health and Linking Words
education
because there is no support for the withdrawal of that money, Use synonyms
society
will suffer economic depression over time. Despite the fact that if that money was used in other areas Use synonyms
such
as the restoration of historical monuments and icon building, could attract tourists, boost the economy, and create job opportunities.
In conclusion, Linking Words
while
governments prioritise the well-being and Linking Words
education
of their citizens, I would argue that neglecting economic and financial restrictions can have detrimental effects. It may result in an economic recession, which holds significant long-term consequences for the nation.Use synonyms
hongminh317