Some people believe that it is better to live and work in a vertical city with multiple tall buildings, as compared to a horizontal city with fewer tall buildings. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There are many considerations that people should give priority to residing and working in tall constructions because of their advantages,

while

others prefer the low ones.

This

writer agrees with the former and gives some main reasons to explain both views.

To begin

with, it should be noted that a horizontal city has its own benefits in terms of safety and a sense of privacy. To explain, saving people from unpredictable situations is less challenging compared to living in high structures, preventing them from profound damage.

Besides

, low-rise structures seem more firm to withstand natural disasters or extreme ones

such

as earthquakes and hurricanes.

Consequently

, those goods ensured high protection in surrounding areas for humans to live in.

However

, during the overpopulation period, vertical property provides much more accommodation for people to reside and work in. To clarify, the density of the population leads to many considerable problems including housing shortages and the pricey expenditure of owning a place. Skyscrapers offer a highly efficient use of limited urban space, accommodating a significantly larger population within the same land area that low-rise buildings would require.

Thus

, the remaining land can be used for other purposes, improving the living standard and solving considerable issues of the globe. Taking everything into account, it should be acknowledged that

although

a horizontal city brings lots of positive sides to our society, it still cannot adapt to the demands of humans recently. Hopefully, in the future, designers can find a new way to construct houses that will solve all of the remarkable problems