Schools should prepare students for the labour market and not waste tme and resources on theoretcal knowledge. Do you agree or disagree?

Currently, most academic institutions instil innovative skills to prepare students from the new generation to knuckle down in the labour market
instead
of going through a plethora of theoretical syllabi.
This
update supposes controversial debates amongst citizens. In the present writing, I agree with schools that prepare students to advertise activities and it will elucidate the pros and cons of
this
position.
To begin
with, practical abilities increase the likelihood of being employable faster than fully academic candidates.
Moreover
, the competence among graduated people is fierce.
For instance
, my cousin was educated by enhancing his pragmatism
instead
of giving all theory involved in the academic program, meanwhile, I was educated based on full theoretical knowledge; I lasted quite a few years to get good work
whereas
my relative took just weeks.
Therefore
, emphasizing job-specific attributes can make a difference in labour retail.
On the other hand
, focus on holistic education fosters critical thinking, research and innovative processes that provide stability and better place conditions.
For example
, returning to the case of my cousin and me, despite being less employable than my relative, I got an activity with a higher position, better off and a life-long contract because of my knowledge and my capabilities to create more effective processes or innovate.
In contrast
, my relative doesn't have any chance to scale up in their organization.
Hence
, academic formation provides better opportunities for job conditions.
To sum up
, both points of view offer good results, with some drawbacks and opportunities.
Nonetheless
, in my opinion, I agree schools should spend more time fostering soft skills
instead
of wasting time on academic syllabi because of office market volatility, the hiring processes are evolving day by day and is better if you have a plethora of abilities to get a good position and is likely to grow up inside of the organization than waiting for you dreamed job.
Submitted by natalyrau13 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Your essay presents a clear position on the topic and offers relevant examples to support your points. However, there are some instances where your ideas could be expressed more clearly and cohesively. Try to ensure that each paragraph has a clear main idea and that your examples directly support that idea.
coherence cohesion
Make sure to clearly separate the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion in your essay. Each paragraph should focus on one main point and should flow logically from one to the next. Your introduction and conclusion are well-defined, but the body paragraphs could benefit from clearer transitions and a more logical structure.
language
There are a few grammatical and lexical inaccuracies in your essay. Pay attention to subject-verb agreement and plurals, and ensure that your vocabulary is used accurately. Proofreading your essay carefully can help to minimize these errors.
task achievement
Your introduction clearly presents the topic and your stance on it.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Labour market
  • Employability
  • Skill gaps
  • Holistic education
  • Critical thinking
  • Innovation
  • Theoretical knowledge
  • Practical skills
  • Adaptability
  • Economic growth
  • Job market volatility
  • Life-long learning
  • Resource allocation
  • Job-specific skills
  • Theoretical foundation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: