It is unquestionable that rising unemployment is one of the in the industrial world. One solution that has been put forward is to cut the working week to a maximum of 35 hours.
However
, in my Linking Words
view
Add a comma
view,
this
solution is rather controversial and other solutions need to be found.
It is fairly easy to Linking Words
this
proposal has been made. Linking Words
workers
are not allowed to work for more than 35 hours weekly, Use synonyms
then
employers will be forced to engage more staff. There would be at least two advantages to Linking Words
this
. unemployment be reduced, but the working conditions of employees on very long shifts would Linking Words
also
be significantly improved. Linking Words
For example
, a factory employing 300 manual Linking Words
workers
doing 10 hours a day might employ 450 Use synonyms
workers
.
There is Use synonyms
also
, Linking Words
however
, a strong argument not to . Linking Words
This
argument is based on economic competitiveness. If a company was forced to employ more Linking Words
workers
to produce the same amount of goods, Use synonyms
then
its wage bill would rise and its products might become more expensive Linking Words
and
compared to companies with longer working weeks. In Correct word choice
apply
this
case, it is possible that the company either might become insolvent or it would have to make some employees redundant. Linking Words
As a result
, Linking Words
to
the personnel would not happen.
In summary, we can see that Change preposition
apply
this
is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages to the proposal. My own personal view is that it would be better not to introduce the shortened working week because it works and not in practice.Linking Words
pateldhruvi038