Some people think that it should be compulsory for people to retake their driving test every 5 years. What are the advantages and disavantages of doing this?
In today's world, driving cars has become a popular and common way of transportation because of their convenience and
time
-saving benefits. Some individuals argue that it should be an obligation to refresh their driver's license
regularly every five years, while
others contend that it should be a once-in-the-life time
test. To discuss further
, I will outline the pros and cons of both sides of policies in the following paragraph.
To begin
with, retesting drivers ensures they maintain quick responses and sufficient knowledge to handle emergencies, which is key to reducing car accidents. For example
, Japan has a strict law requiring drivers to renew their licenses every three or five years for the safety of both pedestrians and drivers. Additionally
, elderly adults do not perceive whether they are eligible to drive safely. The main reason is that they often lack check-ups for their eyesight, reaction time
, and muscle strength, leading to traffic issues. Therefore
, having driving renewal policies indeed possesses its advantages.
On the other hand
, some people may consider about additional cost associated with retaking the driving tests every five years. In addition
, the process of retesting and renewing the driver's license
can be time
-consuming and inconvenient for those occupied with work and family. For instance
, city dwellers who work in the convenience store, have non-regular duty shifts, daytime or nighttime, resulting in limited time
to retest. Thus
, the license
renewal policy may burden the service industry and taxpayers.
In summary, refreshing the car license
regularly or testing only once time
, is likely to have pros and cons. I believe that safety should be the primary consideration because sometimes people would take a risk even if they are not able to drive safely. The government plays a pivotal role in enacting efficient laws or policies to restrict those who pose the
potential danger on the road.Correct article usage
a
Submitted by aa0963178783 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Consider addressing more sides of the argument to provide a more comprehensive view. For example, discuss the impact on public transport or the environment.
task achievement
Elaborate on certain points for a more comprehensive response. For instance, explain how the renewal policy could potentially alleviate traffic issues or reduce insurance costs.
coherence cohesion
Try to avoid repeating similar ideas. For example, both paragraphs touch on the disadvantages of the policy in terms of inconvenience and cost. Distinguish them more clearly for enhanced coherence.
coherence cohesion
Use transitional phrases more effectively to link ideas within paragraphs. Words like 'furthermore,' 'moreover,' and 'on the contrary' can improve flow between sentences.
task achievement
Your essay offers a balanced view of the advantages and disadvantages of retaking driving tests every five years. This shows a good understanding of the topic.
task achievement
The examples provided, such as the situation in Japan and challenges faced by city dwellers, make your arguments more relatable and grounded.
coherence cohesion
Your essay follows a clear and logical structure with an introduction, body paragraphs discussing both sides, and a conclusion. This enhances the readability and understanding of your arguments.
coherence cohesion
The conclusion nicely wraps up the discussion and brings the focus back to the importance of safety and the government's role, which reinforces the main points.