have different views on whether those working in high-skilled occupations should be obliged to carry out their 
 in the same 
 where they completed their training. 
  may mean that they might be able to find employment more easily, I would argue that giving the flexibility to 
 abroad helps nations who suffer from a shortage of workers
,Remove the comma
show examples
  and permits 
 workers to potentially earn higher wages.
Those who advocate that 
 professionals should remain in their 
 of origin point to the benefits that 
 would facilitate their ability to find a job as they would likely know the language, the system of the 
, and other useful information that might help with their expertise in the job. 
, 
 allows them for a much smoother transition between training and their employment, even though they might have acquired education in another, vastly different 
. When they are able to enter the labour market at 
 a fast rate, 
 will 
 allow them to gain more experience more quickly, which is particularly useful given the 
long-trainingCorrect your spelling
show examples
  which 
 occupations require. 
, following the collapse of the USSR, an organisation called TACIS trained the local populations of CIS 
 to develop 
 their abilities. 
, 
 to working in an alternative 
, previous students will able to get a return on their hard 
 at a much faster pace as they will likely have more knowledge on the 
's issues.
, I would argue that trained 
 should be granted permission to decide where to 
 as 
 can help 
 suffering from 
laborChange the spelling
show examples
  shortages. Allowing freedom of movement for working 
 will mean that their invaluable knowledge and talent will be dispersed more evenly across 
. 
, they can contribute to various nations, despite their potentially different nationalities. 
 can 
 potentially lead to greater productivity in economies since 
  may lack the appropriate infrastructure to train these working 
, namely less economically developed 
  as Kenya or where training might be unaffordable to poorer 
 in places like Switzerland. 
, 
 will allow the migrants with the qualifications to apply their knowledge in 
 where it might be needed greatly, which will not just benefit one particular 
 but will 
 greatly help multiple 
. 
, 
 greater flexibility of being able to choose the 
 they complete their tasks might allow them to earn higher wages in the long term. Contrary to the nation where they pursued their skills enhancement, 
 might be more desirable for them. 
 is why there is a high prevalence of international migration of Spanish doctors from Spain to Switzerland, even though Spain is considered to be a developed nation. 
, I feel like 
 would be a more advantageous decision. Not only because their lengthy training will pay off more, but 
 because they will be likely be able to enjoy their job more as they will feel more secure about their future employment prospects.
In conclusion, whilst the high-skilled professionals might indeed have greater employability in the 
 where they may have acquired their skills, I would argue that they shouldn't be restricted to where they 
 as it can benefit other nations who might be interested in accepting 
 workers and can allow them to earn higher wages in the long-term.