Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People
have different views on whether those working in high-skilled occupations should be obliged to carry out their work
in the same country
where they completed their training. While
this
may mean that they might be able to find employment more easily, I would argue that giving the flexibility to work
abroad helps nations who suffer from a shortage of workers,
and permits Remove the comma
apply
such
workers to potentially earn higher wages.
Those who advocate that such
professionals should remain in their country
of origin point to the benefits that this
would facilitate their ability to find a job as they would likely know the language, the system of the country
, and other useful information that might help with their expertise in the job. As a result
, this
allows them for a much smoother transition between training and their employment, even though they might have acquired education in another, vastly different country
. When they are able to enter the labour market at such
a fast rate, this
will consequently
allow them to gain more experience more quickly, which is particularly useful given the long-training
which Correct your spelling
long training
such
occupations require. For instance
, following the collapse of the USSR, an organisation called TACIS trained the local populations of CIS countries
to develop further
their abilities. Consequently
, in contrast
to working in an alternative country
, previous students will able to get a return on their hard work
at a much faster pace as they will likely have more knowledge on the country
's issues.
However
, I would argue that trained people
should be granted permission to decide where to work
as this
can help countries
suffering from labor
shortages. Allowing freedom of movement for working Change the spelling
labour
people
will mean that their invaluable knowledge and talent will be dispersed more evenly across countries
. Therefore
, they can contribute to various nations, despite their potentially different nationalities. This
can as a result
potentially lead to greater productivity in economies since such
countries
may lack the appropriate infrastructure to train these working people
, namely less economically developed countries
such
as Kenya or where training might be unaffordable to poorer people
in places like Switzerland. Consequently
, this
will allow the migrants with the qualifications to apply their knowledge in countries
where it might be needed greatly, which will not just benefit one particular country
but will therefore
greatly help multiple countries
. Furthermore
, this
greater flexibility of being able to choose the country
they complete their tasks might allow them to earn higher wages in the long term. Contrary to the nation where they pursued their skills enhancement, this
might be more desirable for them. This
is why there is a high prevalence of international migration of Spanish doctors from Spain to Switzerland, even though Spain is considered to be a developed nation. Thus
, I feel like this
would be a more advantageous decision. Not only because their lengthy training will pay off more, but also
because they will be likely be able to enjoy their job more as they will feel more secure about their future employment prospects.
In conclusion, whilst the high-skilled professionals might indeed have greater employability in the country
where they may have acquired their skills, I would argue that they shouldn't be restricted to where they work
as it can benefit other nations who might be interested in accepting such
workers and can allow them to earn higher wages in the long-term.Submitted by nejla.abdullayeva on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay is well-structured and your ideas are clearly presented. However, ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single main idea to avoid any potential confusion to readers. For example, separate the point about higher wages into its own paragraph for a stronger emphasis.
task achievement
Some sentences are a bit long and complex, which may make them harder to follow. Try to vary your sentence structures, using a mix of long and short sentences to improve readability.
task achievement
Your response thoroughly addresses all parts of the task, presenting a balanced view of both perspectives and providing a clear opinion.
task achievement
The essay includes relevant and specific examples which effectively support your argument, such as the example of Spanish doctors moving to Switzerland.
Word Count
IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.
A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.
Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.
Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+
Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!