have different views on whether those working in high-skilled occupations should be obliged to carry out their
in the same
where they completed their training.
may mean that they might be able to find employment more easily, I would argue that giving the flexibility to
abroad helps nations who suffer from a shortage of workers
,Remove the comma
show examples
and permits
workers to potentially earn higher wages.
Those who advocate that
professionals should remain in their
of origin point to the benefits that
would facilitate their ability to find a job as they would likely know the language, the system of the
, and other useful information that might help with their expertise in the job.
,
allows them for a much smoother transition between training and their employment, even though they might have acquired education in another, vastly different
. When they are able to enter the labour market at
a fast rate,
will
allow them to gain more experience more quickly, which is particularly useful given the
long-trainingCorrect your spelling
show examples
which
occupations require.
, following the collapse of the USSR, an organisation called TACIS trained the local populations of CIS
to develop
their abilities.
,
to working in an alternative
, previous students will able to get a return on their hard
at a much faster pace as they will likely have more knowledge on the
's issues.
, I would argue that trained
should be granted permission to decide where to
as
can help
suffering from
laborChange the spelling
show examples
shortages. Allowing freedom of movement for working
will mean that their invaluable knowledge and talent will be dispersed more evenly across
.
, they can contribute to various nations, despite their potentially different nationalities.
can
potentially lead to greater productivity in economies since
may lack the appropriate infrastructure to train these working
, namely less economically developed
as Kenya or where training might be unaffordable to poorer
in places like Switzerland.
,
will allow the migrants with the qualifications to apply their knowledge in
where it might be needed greatly, which will not just benefit one particular
but will
greatly help multiple
.
,
greater flexibility of being able to choose the
they complete their tasks might allow them to earn higher wages in the long term. Contrary to the nation where they pursued their skills enhancement,
might be more desirable for them.
is why there is a high prevalence of international migration of Spanish doctors from Spain to Switzerland, even though Spain is considered to be a developed nation.
, I feel like
would be a more advantageous decision. Not only because their lengthy training will pay off more, but
because they will be likely be able to enjoy their job more as they will feel more secure about their future employment prospects.
In conclusion, whilst the high-skilled professionals might indeed have greater employability in the
where they may have acquired their skills, I would argue that they shouldn't be restricted to where they
as it can benefit other nations who might be interested in accepting
workers and can allow them to earn higher wages in the long-term.