Children are now less active in their free time than in the past. Therefore, sports lessons must be compulsory in schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Nowadays, teenagers are becoming lazier and do less exercise than people many decades ago.

Therefore

, there is a need to add more mandatory

sports

lessons in schools for students. In

this

essay, I will present reasons for not being persuaded by

this

statement. On the one hand, adding and turning physical classes to be more compulsory could lead to counterproductive. When teenagers play

sports

with the psychology of being forced to belong, they lose their enthusiasm and dynamism with

sports

.

Instead

, teenagers should be allowed to choose whether to play

sports

or not.

In addition

, physical classes might waste valuable lessons.

For instance

, most publics are always busy with their homework and projects. Especially, with senior students who have to face important entrance exams.

Therefore

, educational institutions should provide more useful classes or programs involving subjects like Math, English, physics, or Chemistry.

On the other hand

, athletic pastimes have some benefits. Admittedly, physical activities improve the public's mental well-being. After stressful class hours, children can have a rest time or relaxation by playing outdoor activities.

This

not only helps develop physical health but

also

mental health.

Moreover

, playing

sports

can be a great chance to help discipline and work with others as a team. Take basketball or soccer,

for example

, team members have to coordinate smoothly in dribbling and passing the ball.

Besides

, they

also

learn to believe in their teammates and respect them. In conclusion, I'm afraid I have to disagree with the opinion that forcing the public to participate in

sports

lessons. Rather, it is to let children decide for themselves what they will do.