In modern society, the demand for
and
has driven widespread air pollution problems. As an answer to
issue, increasing the
of
for
might have been suggested in many areas. I understand
viewpoint,
, I personally disagree with
suggestion because we cannot maintain our lives without using
and other
.
, increasing the
of
ultimately cannot solve pollution problems. Undeniably, for decades, having
and other
as buses or trucks is essential in our daily lives because it is the quickest and the easiest way to get to the destination. Most people seem likely to use those
for their convenience even if the oil
has risen.
, other
which don't use oil, like riding a bike or subway, are uncomfortable. Especially, in the subway, a lot of people are packed in small spaces, which makes them feel stuffed and inconvenienced that we have to stand close to strangers.
, I believe that we cannot stop lowering the rates of car usage by increasing oil prices.
, there are several reasons why the government should not increase the
of
.
has detrimental effects on the public financial struggles. Just imagine that if the
of
increases, the expenditure of standard living costs might be able to increase, which can be a burden to people.
, not only living costs but
the
of products and services will rise,
eventually the satisfaction of the general public will decrease.
, especially in the countryside or remote areas, low-income inhabitants may wrestle with using driving
because of the
of
. What I am concerned about is that
situation will contribute to social inequality which is harmful to social harmony. For these reasons, I think raising the
of
for
has more drawbacks than we have commonly assumed.
In conclusion,
increasing the
of
might be able to reduce the rate of using
to some degree, I firmly believe that it should not be increased because
are an important method in our lives and
could lead to detrimental effects on our society as a whole. I suppose we should find another alternative way to mitigate the environmental problems
.