Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems such as railways and trams To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is often said that it is more vital to use the money on motorways and

wharf

Fix the agreement mistake

wharfs

show examples

, rather than on transportation for the public like trams and railways.

This

writer believes that it is crucial to improve public shipment rather than the wharf

due to

the reason of climate and prices, despite who thinks that the motorways can be convenient. It must be understood that public shipping plays a vital role in protecting the climate.

In other words

, there are some trams and subways in some developed countries that are run by electricity so that they can avoid emitting pollutants into the surroundings. Take Japan as an example, they have invented many subways which use electricity to run,

as a consequence

, Japan is one of the countries which own the cleanest air in the globe.

Thus

, the public traffic can be friendly to the habitat.

However

, some people argue that private shipments running on the harbour can be more convenient.

This

may be true, but many governments are now building an effective public traffic system to serve their citizens.

As a consequence

, using private

transit

now is not as effective as public in some places.

Thus

, using modern public shipment can minimize the inconvenience of sailing One more part worth considering is that the prices of public services are much cheaper than private ones.

This

means that with just only 1 ticket per person, they can

transit

all the routes that the

transit

contains.

This

is more effective compared to the price of running their own movement with gasoline.

For example

, in Vietnam, with only 7000 dongs (approximately 0,28 dollars), the residents in Ho Chi Minh City can navigate around some centre wards in

this

city, much cheaper than running on the same route with private

transit

. If

this

situation continues, private traffic will be less beneficial in prices than public ones. In conclusion, using public services is more eco-friendly and cost-effective than private ones,

although

it brings inconvenience to the citizens compared to private trips.

Furthermore

, it is more crucial to use the fund on public shipping systems than motorways and seaports.