The protection of
environmentAdd an article
show examples
plays a significant role in the natural world. It is,
therefore
, not surprising to see how it has caused
a Correct article usage
show examples
controversy among people about whether
peopleChange noun form
show examples
actions
cannot develop the
environment
, and
onlyCorrect word choice
show examples
corporationsChange noun form
corporations'
corporation's
show examples
and
governmentsChange noun form
show examples
actions
can make a huge difference. Some people firmly support their argument,
while
others adamantly object to it. I have solid reasons to agree with both of
twoCorrect article usage
show examples
which are a single
personChange noun form
show examples
power is not enough to improve and a single
personChange noun form
show examples
power can influence others.
To begin
with, supporters of
this
matter claim that
actionCorrect article usage
show examples
of
Add an article
the organization
an organization
show examples
organizationFix the agreement mistake
show examples
is a bedrock of
protectionCorrect article usage
show examples
of
environmentAdd an article
show examples
. It
widelyAdd a missing verb
show examples
believed that developing the
environment
is a long-term process and, it is only possible with a plan.
For instance
, one reaction about climate
changesFix the agreement mistake
show examples
such
as decreasing plastic consumption cannot make a huge difference.
On the other hand
,
budgetAdd an article
show examples
of individuals impacts
this
issue. Meaning that
governmentsChange noun form
show examples
and corporations’
budgetFix the agreement mistake
show examples
isCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
regular and more organized.
Also
, the fundamental goal of some corporations is only about protection of
environmentAdd an article
show examples
. In short, developing the qualification of environmental subjects
such
as agriculture is influenced not only
budgetChange preposition
show examples
,Remove the comma
show examples
but
also
targetsChange preposition
show examples
.
On the other flip side, opponents of
this
matter have totally different
viewFix the agreement mistake
show examples
about
this
debate. They emphasize that individual
actions
can influence
Add an article
show examples
decisionFix the agreement mistake
show examples
of organizations.
This
is a quite satisfactory argument depending on
factAdd an article
show examples
that a single
person
maybe cannotWrong verb form
show examples
change the all situation but he/she can point out
about Change preposition
show examples
awareness
howChange preposition
show examples
the
environment
has an integral part in life.
For example
, Greta Thunberg who is 13 years old
the
environment
right in the world and gives
speechAdd an article
show examples
about
importanceAdd an article
show examples
of
environmentAdd an article
show examples
. She directly
effectsReplace the word
show examples
governments and international corporations’ opinions. It can be concluded that
Correct article usage
show examples
logicalChange the word
show examples
single
person
criticizeChange the verb form
show examples
impactCorrect article usage
show examples
actionFix the agreement mistake
show examples
of
organizationCorrect article usage
show examples
.
To sum up
, there are limitless
wayFix the agreement mistake
show examples
to make a difference
aboutChange preposition
show examples
developing the
environment
.
Nevertheless
, when everything is considered, I am inclined to believe that there should be a delicate balance between
individualsFix the agreement mistake
show examples
and
organizationReplace the word
show examples
actions
.