There is no denying the fact that every nation has a
police
force to regulate Use synonyms
laws
and rules. Use synonyms
While
it is a commonly held belief that most people are concerned that carrying a gun by Linking Words
police
officers will increase a higher level of violence, there is Use synonyms
also
an argument that opposes it. In my opinion, I consider that the Linking Words
police
force should have weapons to protect civilians.
Use synonyms
To begin
with, Linking Words
police
need a gun for public safety. Use synonyms
In other words
, having armed forces around us will Spread terror to Linking Words
criminals
, Use synonyms
as a result
, the Linking Words
criminals
may fear policemen , Use synonyms
therefore
, they can not commit any crimes. Linking Words
In addition
, Linking Words
criminals
usually have Use synonyms
guns
, so Use synonyms
police
officers need Use synonyms
guns
to control them. Use synonyms
For example
, in an emergency, if the officers see a crime happen, Linking Words
then
having a gun with them is helpful to stop a violent act.
Another point to consider, the government should have strict Linking Words
laws
to prevent Use synonyms
guns
in markets. It is Use synonyms
also
possible to say that, Linking Words
instead
of taking Linking Words
guns
from the Use synonyms
police
, the government should make strict Use synonyms
laws
against the general public having a firearm. Use synonyms
Moreover
, many countries face daily violence, because there are no complex rules about Linking Words
guns
. Use synonyms
For example
, in the US, there was a gunshot accident in high school and the rate of crimes is increasing dramatically, Linking Words
due to
Linking Words
laws
were not strict enough.
In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe that forced men should have weapons to protect the public from Use synonyms
criminals
and the government should put rules to prevent Use synonyms
guns
, which will help to decrease the level of terrorism.Use synonyms
deemaalkhathlan1