Some people believe that if police force carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
There is no denying the fact that every nation has a
police
force to regulate
laws
and rules.
While
it is a commonly held belief that most people are concerned that carrying a gun by
police
officers will increase a higher level of violence, there is
also
an argument that opposes it. In my opinion, I consider that the
police
force should have weapons to protect civilians.
To begin
with,
police
need a gun for public safety.
In other words
, having armed forces around us will Spread terror to
criminals
,
as a result
, the
criminals
may fear policemen ,
therefore
, they can not commit any crimes.
In addition
,
criminals
usually have
guns
, so
police
officers need
guns
to control them.
For example
, in an emergency, if the officers see a crime happen,
then
having a gun with them is helpful to stop a violent act. Another point to consider, the government should have strict
laws
to prevent
guns
in markets. It is
also
possible to say that,
instead
of taking
guns
from the
police
, the government should make strict
laws
against the general public having a firearm.
Moreover
, many countries face daily violence, because there are no complex rules about
guns
.
For example
, in the US, there was a gunshot accident in high school and the rate of crimes is increasing dramatically,
due to
laws
were not strict enough. In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe that forced men should have weapons to protect the public from
criminals
and the government should put rules to prevent
guns
, which will help to decrease the level of terrorism.
Submitted by deemaalkhathlan1 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Clarify the key points and ensure each paragraph has a clear central idea.
coherence cohesion
Improve transitions between paragraphs to enhance the flow of the essay.
task achievement
Provide more specific examples or statistics to support the arguments.
task achievement
Develop each main point in more depth to demonstrate critical thinking.
coherence cohesion
The introduction clearly sets up the issue and presents your stance.
coherence cohesion
The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points, reinforcing your position.
task achievement
You provide relevant arguments to support your viewpoint, demonstrating a good understanding of the topic.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Deterrence
  • Arms race
  • Public perception
  • Militarization
  • Law enforcement
  • Escalation of conflict
  • Lethal force
  • Use-of-force policies
  • Crime deterrence
  • Civil liberty
  • Community policing
  • De-escalation techniques
  • Accountability
  • Apprehension
  • Non-lethal alternatives
  • Social fabric
  • Judicial oversight
What to do next:
Look at other essays: