Many people believe individuals involved with creative arts should be financially supported by the government. Some other believe they should find seperate resources. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.

In today’s society, the role of authorities in supporting individuals involved in creative

arts

is a topic of much debate.

While

some argue that politics should provide financial support to the list, others believe that they should find separate resources. In my opinion, both views have their merits, and a balanced approach is necessary.

On the other hand

, there are those who argue that

artists

should find separate resources to support their work. They believe that relying on regime funding can lead to a lack of independence and creativity, as

artists

may feel pressured to conform to the law's expectations.

Furthermore

, they argue that in a free market economy,

artists

should be able to aid themselves through their work, just like any other profession.

Additionally

, rule encouragement can

also

ensure that

artists

have a stable income, allowing them to focus on their craft without the worry of financial instability. In my view, a balanced approach is necessary.

While

ministry support can be beneficial in promoting and preserving the

arts

, it should not be the sole source of funding for

artists

. They should

also

be encouraged to seek alternative sources of income,

such

as grants, sponsorships, and sales of their work.

This

approach can help ensure that

artists

have the freedom to pursue their creative vision

while

also

being financially sustainable. In conclusion, the question of the power assist for individuals involved in creative

arts

is a complex issue.

While

state funding can be beneficial, it should not be the only source of help for the troupe. A combination of union funding and alternative resources can help ensure the sustainability and independence of the

arts

.