Why do celebrities earn more money than politicians? Is it a positive or negative development?
In contemporary society, the
income
disparity between celebrities
and politicians
has reached appreciable proportions. This
essay delves into the underlying factors behind this
phenomenon and presents a perspective on whether it is a positive or negative development.
There are a host of reasons contributing to the significant income
gap between celebrities
and politicians
. Notably, celebrities
often derive their income
not only from their primary profession but also
from lucrative endorsement deals with corporate giants. Take, for instance
, Cristiano Ronaldo, an iconic footballer whose earnings extend beyond the pitch. In addition
to his salary as a player, he amasses substantial wealth through sponsorship agreements with major brands like Adidas, where he promotes their products on his social media platforms such
as Instagram and Twitter. Even less well-known celebrities
could also
generate multiple sources of income
in a similar fashion. This
diversification of income
streams is a primary driver of celebrities
' superior earnings when compared to politicians
, who predominantly rely on fixed salaries and are constrained by their roles in the political arena, which seldom intersect with the commercial world.
From my perspective, while
the growth in income
for celebrities
means better living standards for such
individuals, the lopsided income
distribution has the potential to yield adverse effects on a societal level. Chief among these is that the disproportionate gap between the salaries of politicians
and celebrities
might drive an increasing number of people, especially young ones, towards the entertainment industry rather than politics as well as
other fields. This
can be seen in Vietnam where many young adults, especially those in Generation Z, attempt to become influencers on popular social media platforms such
as TikTok and Instagram due to
the high stream of income
. This
might contribute to the imbalance in the job market. More worryingly, a society that excessively rewards fame and fortune over public service and leadership may prioritize materialistic values over qualities such
as integrity, empathy, and altruism. This
shift in values can have detrimental effects on societal cohesion.
In conclusion, the substantial income
gap between celebrities
and politicians
arises from the diverse revenue streams available to celebrities
and the constraints of a political career. This
phenomenon could pose serious challenges to the job market and the development of society.Submitted by tahsin.adam3 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
To enhance the Task Response, ensure that all parts of the prompt are fully addressed. While you have provided a thorough explanation of why celebrities earn more and argued why this might be a negative development, you could include a brief mention of any potential positives as well, to present a balanced view.
coherence cohesion
Ensure each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next, and within paragraphs, make sure that the logical flow is consistently clear. You have done well in this regard, but introducing more linking words can make your argument even more cohesive.
coherence cohesion
The essay follows a clear structure with a well-defined introduction and conclusion that effectively summarize the main points.
coherence cohesion
The points made are well-supported with specific examples, such as the reference to Cristiano Ronaldo and the situation in Vietnam, which add depth to the argument.
task achievement
The essay does a good job of explaining the reasons behind the income disparity and the potential negative implications for society, which directly addresses the prompt.