Some people think that scientists experimenting with animal in a laboratory is the only way we can guarantee new products will be safe for human use to what extent do you agree or disagree

Many individuals argue that medical experts are using wildlife

creatures

for testing new theories and

this

is the best way to confirm for human use.

This

essay totally disagrees with

this

statement because

this

will lead to

the

Correct article usage

a

show examples

negative impact on the environmental cycle and there are huge variations between animal and human anatomy.

To begin

with, the laboratory testing of

animals

done by scientists has many drawbacks.

Firstly

, the environmental cycle is being affected

due to

the use of the

creatures

in the testing for new medicines. To elaborate,people,trees and wildlife are the significant elements of the natural world,

therefore

if any one of them gets hurt, it will harm the living world badly.

For example

, I exactly remember,when I was in school,there was a lesson about

this

, humans are dependent on

animals

for milk,

whereas

animals

rely on trees for their food sources.

Thus

, these all depend on each other for their survival.

In addition

, human and wildlife

creatures

have plenty of differences in their body mechanisms. If anatomy is different,it will be hard to predict the safe side for folks.

Moreover

, the

animals

also

have their families and scientists and other experts do not have a right to use them for laboratory testing. They should look for another solution to tackle

this

area.

To conclude

,

creatures

are

a

Correct the article-noun agreement

apply

show examples

vital parts of the natural ecosystem and they have their families,

therefore

medical experts should find other plans rather than trying

animals

in their labs.