It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote areas with natural environments, such as the South Pole. Is this a positive or negative development?

Given the availability of modern means of transport

such

as planes and cruise ships, and refrigeration technologies, travelling to remote parts of the

world

is no longer an impossible task. I believe that

this

possibility benefits both tourists and scientists. Exploring far-flung natural places can be beneficial to travellers. No matter how many tourist attractions are there in the

world

, globetrotters all around the

world

still crave novelty,

for example

in the form of new activities or untouched destinations. By travelling to an island

that is

unknown to the vast majority of people,

for instance

, travellers may have a chance to participate in exotic religious practices of indigenous people, feast their eyes on rarely seen plants and animals try new food and experience a whole new way of life.

Although

it is true that they can see these things on TV channels dedicated to travel, the experience is far inferior to experiencing

such

activities in person. Scientists can

also

benefit from visiting untouched parts of the

world

. Regardless of how much we already know about the

world

, there is still much

that is

unknown in the

world

of science and visiting

such

places could give scientists answers to many existing and future problems. We can see

this

in the way novel viruses break out every once in a

while

, and how global warming is affecting the lives and habitats of elusive animals living in heavily wooded areas and deep under the sea. If we understand more about

such

phenomena, we will be much more prepared for potential outbreaks that could kill millions in the future and help restore damaged habitats. In conclusion, visiting remote areas of the

world

can impart

otherwise

unachievable experiences and lessons

in

Change preposition

to

show examples

tourists and people in the scientific

world

.