There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically. As a result, some people believe that non-academic subjects, such as physical education and cookery, should be removed from the school syllabus so that children can concentrate on academic work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Students face study stress

due to

an increase in competition. Certain people believe that non-academic

subjects

can be excavated from the school syllabus. I argue with the statement. I concur with the prior that education should be holistic and science, maths and law are equally important as art, drama and sports. To commence with, there is no denying that major

subjects

such

as physics, chemistry, biology and maths have played an integral role in the young generation. life These are major pillars of future studies or higher education and good knowledge and understanding of these is beneficial for future jobs.

For instance

, lucrative employment always hires a good student in terms of academic knowledge

such

as Doctors and engineers are highly paid professions.

On the other hand

, it is invaluable for youngsters to become all-rounded as it is essential for individuals to have a harmonious balance between extracurriculars and academics.

Furthermore

, schools are the first place where a person can learn and acquire different life skills.

Therefore

, skills like time management, stress handling, and working in a team should be taught.

As a result

, adolescents can work more efficiently in the community.

Moreover

,

subjects

like art, drama, food making and music should

also

be delivered at schools. In

this

way, students will be creative and feel relaxed as it divides the burden of major

subjects

. In conclusion,

although

the academic subject has an evident impact on a person's development in the academic arena.

However

, like skills are equally important for surviving in society without any stumbling blocks it is better to create a balance.