Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorcyle than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some individuals presume that spending the budget on traffic infrastructure and private

vehicles

is more pivotal than on the transport for the community

such

as trains or buses.

This

writer strongly disagrees with

this

opinion

due to

the enormous benefits of public transit in terms of sustainability and equity. There is no doubt that public

vehicles

are more environmentally friendly than private ones, so they definitely play a crucial role in protecting surrounding habitats.

In other words

, when people utilize

this

community transport, the number of individual

vehicles

such

as cars and motorbikes declines significantly;

as a consequence

, the fewer means of transit on the roads, the fewer emissions are released, especially carbon dioxide (CO2) which is considered as the main reason for clime change.

Hence

, more investment in public transport systems will enhance the quality of the atmosphere and tackle climate change all over the world. Another point for consideration is that using

vehicles

for citizens is more cost-effective than paying a fortune to own a car or motorcycle. Nowadays, a private vehicle usually costs roughly thousands of dollars which is prohibitively expensive for residents;

as a result

, utilizing buses or trams seems to be more affordable and accessible. With a few dollars per ticket, people are able to travel around their city and reach their expected destinations.

Therefore

, if public vehicle systems are developed in every area, it will help residents save money

as well as

enhance their lives. In conclusion, local authorities should invest more in the transportation for community which increases the quality of the environment and residents’ lives

instead

of roads and motorways with unnecessarily high costs.