Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems.

The

passage

discusses the debate surrounding the allocation of investment budgets in transportation infrastructure, specifically focusing on the prioritization of roads and motorways over public

transport

like railways and trams. The writer presents a counterargument to the prevalent viewpoint, emphasizing the negative impact of pollutants associated with private vehicle usage. The

passage

highlights the increasing popularity of private vehicles globally, leading to issues

such

as congestion, pollution, and compromised air quality. It posits that investing in the refurbishment of roads and motorways could serve as a solution to these problems.

Additionally

, it argues that developing a private

transport

system can enhance citizen safety and reduce risks. The

passage

also

contends that investing in road infrastructure should prioritize serving local residents, citing examples

such

as the holiday and weekend highway congestion in China.

However

, the

passage

also

advocates for government subsidization of public

transport

systems

such

as railways and trams. It suggests that improving public

transport

options could contribute to a reduction in pollutants by decreasing the reliance on private vehicles.

This

, in turn, would lead to lower emissions of greenhouse gases, contributing to the preservation of the ozone layer.

Furthermore

, it asserts that bolstering public

transport

can improve air quality and aid in the fight against global warming.

Lastly

, it highlights the potential for residents to save money on fuel and vehicle repairs by utilizing public

transport

. In conclusion, the

passage

urges the government to encourage the use of public

transport

due to

its affordability and environmentally friendly nature.