The government should control the Internet to reduce cyber crime and ensure safety of users. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The prevalence of technological tools in modern society has led to an increase in cyber crimes. Some people believe that intervention from the
government
is necessary to protect the safety of the public. I partially agree with
this
, for the growing threat of the invasion of their privacy
although
the excessive control from the authority can limit
access
to essential
information
. On one hand, there is an increasing need for supervision of the Internet from the
government
since the advance of technology has made it easier to steal personal
information
.
In other words
, potential criminals are more likely to crack down the complicated codes to
access
private data
such
as the number of credit cards and addresses using sophisticated intelligence and skills. The number of reports including fraud and stalking rises dramatically, some of which even lead to the loss of life as people get involved in serious accidents.
Therefore
, screening out suspicious acts online to protect their private
information
should be conducted on a frequent basis to promote their sense of security.
On the other hand
, the control of the Internet from the
government
is not necessary as it can regulate
access
to even helpful resources. Indeed, some
information
can be deleted to its own advantage, which prevents the public from knowing the important truth.
For instance
, the authority may block down some sites which contain political doubt and misconduct of members of parliament for fear of declining trust and rebellious acts of citizens. Its patrol does not always aim to protect their safety and prevents their right to know the significant truth, which will lead to the weakening of democracy and the corrupt
government
. In conclusion, I somewhat agree with the
government
supervising the Internet to secure the private
information
of users from cyber-attacks because of the growing threats
such
as fraud and stalking.
However
, the authority should exercise its power not to limit democracy by ensuring the right to
access
any kind of
information
.
Submitted by mizuho on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Your task response is strong; however, there’s room for improvement in the clarity and comprehensiveness of your ideas. Be sure to fully elaborate on each point to maximize impact.
coherence and cohesion
Improve coherence by ensuring smooth transitions between your points. Try to make each paragraph flow naturally into the next to maintain the reader's engagement.
task response
You've made a good effort to support your main points with relevant examples. However, aim to include more varied examples to strengthen your arguments.
introduction and conclusion
You have a clear and relevant introduction and conclusion which effectively frame your argument.
supported points
Your main points are well-supported and logical, demonstrating good depth of thought.
logical structure
Your logical structure works well, making your essay easy to follow.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • cybercrime
  • regulations
  • monitoring
  • suspicious activities
  • internet safety
  • user trust
  • e-commerce
  • censorship
  • freedom of speech
  • access to information
  • over-regulation
  • innovation
  • tech industry
  • data protection
  • identity theft
  • financial fraud
  • technical limitations
  • digital landscape
What to do next:
Look at other essays: