some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than other ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a controversial perspective that heat up a debate about whether efforts should be made to protect and preserve certain old

buildings

more than others. In my opinion,

while

each has its perks, I would contend that

this

is ideal to combine both mentioned factors. Without a shadow of a doubt, protecting old

buildings

is of the essence for people. Unlike common beliefs that every ancient building is out of date and has no

value

whatsoever, in fact, these great achievements bear enormous

value

when it comes to architecture.

This

is because

such

structures can consist of a long history, which educates people on historical events.

For instance

,

buildings

such

as Hoa Lo Prison Relic or the Temple of Literature, not only bring historical

value

but

also

give people a chance to learn about what happened in the past.

Hence

, it is necessary to maintain old-age constructions.

While

the redeeming features of protecting old

buildings

play a paramount role, their counterparts still linger. The explanation for

this

is that many older

buildings

require significant amounts of money to restore them to a structurally suitable condition.

While

there is a myriad of other aspects that the government has to pay for. The improvement of education and

that

Correct determiner usage

apply

show examples

of

Change preposition

apply

show examples

health can be cited as two of the most outstanding instances.

Thus

, some certain old-age

buildings

are not worthy of preservation. In conclusion, certain structures act as living testaments to the country’s antiquity.

Therefore

, constructions should be selected that have inherent

value

and they should be maintained by governments.