Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

Admittedly, old
buildings
have historical and cultural
value
, protected by legal regulations.
However
, some opponents believe these structures should be converted into commercial properties. From my perspective, I insist that these
facilities
should be preserved.
To begin
with, the historical and cultural
value
of these complexes is undeniable. The historical
value
of vintage
facilities
lies in the materials used in constructing these
buildings
, which have lasted over time,
while
the cultural
value
is reflected in their architectural designs and the sacred customs conducted within them.
Hence
, some cultural events passed down through generations show the diversity of culture and depth of history.
Additionally
, the various architectural styles over time reflect the aesthetic abilities of mankind, and the technology in materials and construction methods mirror the level of scientific advancements in these civilizations. Operating sacred events in these infrastructures can partially cover the maintenance fees, allowing descendants to learn about their identity and instilling national pride.
For instance
, conducting the Hung Vuong Festival in remaining ancient
facilities
reminds descendants of their ancestors' sacrifices for peace and independence, teaching people valuable historical lessons.
Nevertheless
, opponents now focus on financial returns, believing that some unnecessary old complexes should be replaced by new ones. With population explosion and accelerating urbanization, space is needed to meet commercial profitability activities.
Therefore
, converting old amenities into shophouses is a preferential idea for some citizens. Modernized
facilities
can better promote economic development and bring fresh life to citizens.
For example
, more fashion shophouses,
such
as Lily stores in Hanoi, Vietnam, attract many tourists because of their stylish offerings.
To conclude
, old
buildings
play an important role in sustaining the cultural and traditional values of a nation, so these infrastructures should be protected.
While
modernizing old
buildings
for commercial purposes can promote economic development, it is essential to strike a balance between preserving historical sites and accommodating urban growth. In my opinion, Renovating rather than replacing these structures can maintain their cultural significance
while
meeting contemporary needs.
Submitted by lenam2k1 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
The introduction could be slightly more engaging to draw the reader in immediately. Consider rephrasing the opening sentence for a stronger impact.
coherence cohesion
Although the conclusion provides a good summary, it could be made stronger by elaborating more on the proposed solution of renovating rather than replacing old buildings. This would further reinforce the essay's main argument.
task achievement
Ensure that all sentences are clear and precise. For example, 'Renovating rather than replacing these structures can maintain their cultural significance while meeting contemporary needs.' should not start with a capital 'Renovating' as it is part of the concluding sentence.
task achievement
While the essay includes relevant examples, it could benefit from a bit more variety in the examples and perhaps some statistical data to further strengthen the arguments presented.
task achievement
The essay provides a complete and well-rounded response to the task, addressing both the importance of preserving old buildings and the argument for replacing them with new structures.
coherence cohesion
There is a clear and logical structure to the essay, with each paragraph flowing seamlessly into the next. The essay begins with an introduction, followed by body paragraphs that discuss the main points, and ends with a well-rounded conclusion.
task achievement
The main points are well-supported with relevant examples, such as the reference to conducting the Hung Vuong Festival and the Lily stores in Hanoi. These examples help to illustrate the arguments effectively.
task achievement
The essay maintains a good balance between addressing the historical importance of old buildings and the economic benefits of replacing them with new structures. This shows a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are both present and effective. The introduction sets the stage for the discussion, and the conclusion provides a thoughtful summary of the arguments made, emphasizing the need for balance.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • heritage
  • conservation
  • architectural integrity
  • cultural significance
  • tourist attraction
  • sustainable development
  • urban renewal
  • aesthetic value
  • historical preservation
  • modernization
  • economic benefits
  • unique character
  • environmental impact
  • demolition
  • retrofitting
  • adaptive reuse
  • urban landscape
  • cultural legacy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: