Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are better ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
When addressing
air
pollution
, the notion of implementing car-free
days
globally is often championed as an effective solution. However
, amidst various approaches, the writer finds merit in prioritizing the adoption of electric vehicles
and renewable energy
for their sustainable impact, despite the potential benefits of car-free
days
.
The utilization of electric vehicles
stands as a promising avenue in combating air
pollution
. By transitioning to electric transportation, the emission of pollutants, including harmful dust particles, is significantly curtailed, thereby fostering cleaner air
. Notably, in Vietnam, the adoption of electric vehicles
, such
as those from the Vinfast brand, has contributed to a notable reduction in traffic-related emissions. Consequently
, embracing electric vehicles
presents a tangible means for individuals to actively contribute to environmental preservation.
Conversely
, proponents of car-free
days
argue for their efficacy in raising awareness and prompting behavioral
change among residents. Change the spelling
behavioural
This
approach underscores the reliance on gasoline-powered vehicles
as a primary source of pollution
. While
commendable, solely relying on car-free
days
may not suffice in addressing the pervasive issue of air
pollution
. Alternative strategies are imperative to ensure sustained efforts in preserving air
quality.
Green energy
emerges as a compelling solution in this
regard. The utilization of renewable energy
sources offers a sustainable and non-toxic means of power generation, further
contributing to air
pollution
mitigation. Notably, countries like Germany have made significant strides in adopting wind and solar power, resulting in a marked reduction in smog levels. This
exemplifies the potential of green energy
to mitigate air
pollution
on a larger scale.
In summary, while
car-free
days
offer benefits in raising awareness, the writer contends that prioritizing the adoption of electric vehicles
and green energy
stands as more
sustainable Correct article usage
a more
solutions
Fix the agreement mistake
solution
in
minimizing Change preposition
for
air
pollution
. By embracing these alternatives, individuals and governments alike can collectively strive towards a cleaner and healthier environment.Submitted by Nghỉ hè vui vẻ cả nhà on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay would benefit from a clearer and more concise introduction. Define your stance more explicitly and briefly mention the main supporting points you will discuss.
task achievement
In your body paragraphs, ensure each argument is clearly elaborated and directly linked to the main topic. While your points are relevant, some sentences seem almost repetitive. Focus on efficiently conveying your message without redundancy.
coherence cohesion
The essay is well-structured, presenting both perspectives before concluding with a personal opinion.
task achievement
Relevant and specific examples, such as the mention of Vinfast in Vietnam and Germany's green energy, effectively support your arguments.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?