Some people believe that the best way to deal with heavy traffic in city centers is for privately owned cars to be banned, others however, think this is an unrealistic solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Today,
traffic
jams are a severely disturbing phenomenon in some overpopulated urbanized cities. Some people
argue that privately owned vehicles should be disallowed to enter city centres. Others, however
, disagree and believe that it will not be a viable solution. In this
context, it is a matter of debate.
On the one hand, people
in favour of prohibiting privately registered cars
argue that traffic
congestion was originally created by the immense numbers of citizens' vehicles. In addition
, some people
in fact own multiple cars
or even more. For instance
, a single household may obtain more than one car for each family member and drive separately to a gathering in the city centre. In his book, Urban Catastrophe, Dr Victor Sam discusses this
issue by saying, “Over 90% of London population own multiple cars
and then
people
wonder, why such
a problem exists?” Consequently
, it has been advocated for a while
to simply disallow ordinary people
’s cars
from approaching the mid-town.
On the other hand
, the argument seems to be absurd and lacks comprehension of the true nature of the issue. Firstly
, people
should not be responsible for the faulty planning and structuring done by loose authority in the first place. In other words
, restricting citizens from their basic rights because of shabby traffic
designs is, absolutely, reprehensible. The government should work on logical and viable solutions such
as the newly designed highway bridges in Egypt, for example
, instead
of turning their backs and blaming people
’s properties.
To conclude
, it is understandable to look thoroughly into the ever-rising traffic
congestion hurdle. Whether banning the vehicles of the community to abreast city centres would be realistic or not, is still arguable amongst decision-makers. Personally, I tend to appreciate people
’s right to own and move freely without any restrictions.Submitted by besoyam on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
complete response
Consider exploring counterarguments in more depth to further strengthen the discussion.
logical structure
Maintain the logical structure by ensuring smooth transitions between paragraphs or adding linking phrases.
supported main points
While the main points are well-supported, consider adding more specific data or examples to further substantiate your claims.
introduction conclusion present
The essay provides a clear introduction and conclusion, which frame the discussion well.
logical structure
Each paragraph addresses different perspectives on the issue, showing balanced reasoning.
relevant specific examples
The essay includes relevant and specific examples, such as the reference to Dr. Victor Sam's book and the highway bridges in Egypt.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?