large companies should provide sport and social facilities to community. To what extent do you argee or disagree?

In the discourse surrounding corporate social responsibility, the question of whether large

companies

should be obligated to provide sports and social

facilities

in local communities remains contentious. Personally, I think large

companies

should not be obliged to provide sports and social

facilities

in local communities.

Firstly

, large

companies

aren't the ones to shoulder the responsibility of providing sports and social

facilities

in local communities. That's a job for the government, not for profit-driven

companies

. Governments are there to look out for everyone's needs and

meets

Change the verb form

meet

show examples

them.

In stead

Correct your spelling

Instead

show examples

of relying on big

companies

to do

this

, we should risk taking the pressure off governments to do their job properly.

Moreover

, these

companies

also

have to deal with their own internal needs. Their focus needs to be on innovating, improving their products, and making sure their employees are well-trained and motivated, they must constantly strive to improve their products and services to meet the ever-changing demands of consumers and

ưhen

Correct your spelling

when

employees feel respected and supported when receiving benefits that the

company

provides, they are more likely to be engaged, productive and loyal to the

company

. Spending money on community

facilities

might sound nice, but it only benefits the

company

's reputation so it could end up hurting the

company

's ability to stay competitive and keep people employed. So, let's keep things in perspective. Big

companies

should stick to what they're good at, and governments should step up to the plate to make sure everyone has access to the

facilities

and support they need to thrive.