Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Many people argue that governments should allocate more money for

railways

rather than

roads

. Personally, I completely disagree with

this

view. For a variety of reasons, it would be wrong to reduce resources for investment in

roads

.

Firstly

,

roads

play a fundamental role in

transportation

, which assists in moving people and goods from one place to another, particularly in short distances.

Secondly

,

due to

increasing

Correct article usage

the increasing

show examples

population in big cities, developing

roads

will reduce traffic congestion significantly, especially in peak

time

Fix the agreement mistake

times

show examples

.

For example

, citizens in major metropolises usually have difficulty

in

Change preposition

apply

show examples

moving because the population is growing day by day, but the progress of road extension is too slow, and

this

leads to traffic congestion.

Finally

, if the authorities only concentrate on improving

railways

, we might have a situation in which

roads

are always more overloaded than

railways

. In my opinion, we should spend money on both

railways

and

roads

. It is beneficial for all members of society to have many options with a view to moving or delivering goods.

This

will restrict overload in

roads

, and contribute to

enhance

Change the verb form

enhancing

show examples

transportation

Correct article usage

the transportation

show examples

industry.

For instance

, a nation with a good

transportation

system will ensure orders are delivered on time and

therefore

plenty of transport companies will be established,

this

result in a lot of jobs

as well as

contributing to the development of the nation.

To sum up

, I believe that

transportation

plays a key role in national development.

Thus

, governments should spend money on both

railways

and

roads

.