the question is people believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay tax to the state. Agree or disagree
It is popularly believed in society that residents have the right of self-managing their income,
instead
of spending on tax revenue. The writer of this
essay disagrees with this
statement, primarily due to
the importance of social welfare. However
, others are opposed to this
belief when it comes to personal satisfaction.
Foremostly,it must be acknowledged that tax money is the purpose of investing in collective benefits. To put it simply, if authorities aim to enhance the living standards of communities, the provision of social services as well as
public infrastructure must take place. As a result
, the funding for these initiatives should be mostly sponsored by the citizens since its orientation is to ensure equal and sustainable support for all. Take Vietnam as a contextual example where its government stimulates every individual to donate to free vaccination programs, resulting in providing everyone, especially the poor with health guarantees.
Nevertheless
, many hold the opinion of letting themselves allocate their expenditure to fulfil the sense of accomplishment. It is because of their hard-working efforts to earn a living that they may prefer to reward themselves rather than subsidise community welfare. This
point may be valid, but if this
situation continued, this
essential assistance would be underfunded. Consequently
, it will likely lead to social instability and increase inequality in terms of living conditions between the rich and poor. Therefore
, regardless of serving personal interests, it is crucial to live for a better future for society.
In conclusion, paying taxes is assumed to play a vital role in the authority of a country so as to afford social support. Contrastingly, despite this
moral purpose, some suppose that it is not their prior duty toward the public,compared to investing in themselvesSubmitted by Nghỉ hè vui vẻ cả nhà on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
structure
Your essay has a solid structure, but make sure to keep a uniform style from beginning to end. It might be helpful to break down long sentences into shorter, clearer ones. This can improve the overall readability of your essay.
depth
A deeper exploration of counterarguments would enrich your essay. For instance, you briefly mention personal satisfaction but do not delve into how this could validly challenge the need for taxation. Addressing such concerns with more depth can make your argument more robust.
language
You have some minor language errors such as "Foremostly" which should be "First and foremost," and spacing issues like "public,compared" should be "public, compared." These don't detract significantly from understanding but polishing them could enhance the overall score.
summary
Your introduction and conclusion are present and clearly summarize your position, making the essay cohesive.
examples
You provide relevant, specific examples like the Vietnam vaccination program to support your points. This adds credibility to your argument.
balance
The essay covers both sides of the argument, demonstrating a balanced perspective before concluding with your viewpoint.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?