Some people believe that the internet has made books and libraries obsolete. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Provide reason and support with examples.
The debate over whether the government should establish free
libraries
in every town or if it's an unnecessary expense due to
widespread internet
access
requires thoughtful examination. Both sides of this
argument have valid points, but I believe that free libraries
remain a worthwhile investment for several reasons.
On the one hand, critics believe that with the proliferation of the Internet
, physical libraries
are becoming obsolete and represent an unnecessary expense. They contend that people can now access
a vast amount of information online, rendering the need for physical books and libraries
less significant. From a cost-effectiveness standpoint, they believe that public funds could be better utilized elsewhere
. Critics emphasize the importance of fiscal responsibility, especially in an era when many resources are shifting towards digital platforms. They argue that investing in technologies such
as improved internet
access
and digital educational tools might yield greater benefits than establishing or maintaining physical libraries
.
On the other hand
, proponents of free libraries
argue that they play an essential role in providing equitable access
to information and fostering a reading culture. Libraries
are often seen as community hubs, serving as spaces for learning, research, and cultural enrichment. They provide a quiet and focused environment for studying, which can be especially important for students who may not have suitable spaces at home. Additionally
, not everyone has access
to the Internet
, particularly in remote or economically disadvantaged areas. Libraries
bridge this
digital divide by offering free internet
access
to those who need it, ensuring that everyone can benefit from online resources.
In summary, in my view, while
the internet
has transformed information access
, libraries
remain essential for education, community engagement, and personal growth. To stay relevant, they should integrate modern technology and expand digital services, ensuring their continued value in the 21st century.Submitted by Nghỉ hè vui vẻ cả nhà on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
While your essay is logically structured and includes main points and a conclusion, it would benefit from including more specific examples or case studies to strengthen your arguments. For instance, mentioning successful library initiatives or specific communities that have benefited from free libraries could provide more depth.
task achievement
Your ideas are generally clear, but the essay would be more compelling if you added more nuance to your arguments. For example, discussing the varying needs of different demographics and how libraries meet these needs would add complexity to your viewpoint.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction effectively sets the stage for your discussion, and your conclusion nicely wraps up your argument while summarizing the main points.
coherence cohesion
The essay is well-organized, and the logical structure makes it easy to follow your arguments. Each paragraph transitions smoothly into the next, which maintains the flow.
task achievement
You provided clear reasons for why libraries should remain a worthwhile investment, and you explained the counterarguments coherently, which enhanced the overall quality of your essay.