the three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001
Contained in the pie charts is data pertaining to the expenditure in a UK school in three different timestamps, 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Overall
, Insurance, teachers’ salaries and equipment witnessed varying degrees of increase, Linking Words
while
other workers’ payment and resource patterns dropped. Linking Words
Additionally
, academic staff salaries contributed the largest proportion of expenditure throughout the survey Linking Words
whereas
insurance had the smallest share.
Linking Words
To begin
, wages paid to the teacher accounted for the most significant in 1981. Before increasing to a half Linking Words
then
slightly went down by 10% in 2001. Linking Words
This
statistic was followed by other Linking Words
Fix the agreement mistake
workers’
worker’s
salaries, in 1981, the number was nearly a Change noun form
workers’
third,
after which a minimal decrease in 1991 Linking Words
then
ended with 15% after 10 years. A similar trend was observed in money spent on furniture and equipment, beginning at 15% Linking Words
then
it experienced a noticeable fall of 10% in 1991 before having a remarkable rise to a quarter Linking Words
at the end
of time shown.
Turning to the expenditure on resources, the figure started at 15%, which is equal to furniture and equipment. Linking Words
Subsequently
, it went up by only 5% during 10 years, in the third year shown, it levelled off at approximately one-tithe. Linking Words
Finally
, Insurance had by far the smallest category out of five at the beginning with 2%, Linking Words
this
figure changed small throughout a decade until 2001 when it climbed fourfold.Linking Words
Submitted by [email protected] on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Introduction: The introduction is missing.
▼
Introduction: Change the first sentence in the introduction.
▼
Conclusion: The conclusion is too long.
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "figure" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "went down" was used 2 times.
▼