In number of countries, some People think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing New railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The debate over whether public funds should be invested in constructing new railway
lines
for high-speed trains or improving existing public transit has sparked significant controversy. While
some advocate for enhancing the current transportation infrastructure, I believe that investing in new lines
offers greater benefits for both society and the environment.
To begin
with, the construction of new railway lines
offers significant comfort and convenience. People can travel to distant destinations more quickly, reducing the need for personal vehicles and thus
decreasing air pollution. This
reduction in pollution not only mitigates climate change and global warming but also
lowers the mortality rate of indigenous flora and fauna. Additionally
, fewer emissions lead to a decrease in respiratory diseases among the population. For example
, when the Iranian government shifted focus from improving existing transport to constructing new ones, individuals reported better access to different parts of the country and a reduction in hospital visits for lung conditions.
On the other hand
, some argue that enhancing the facilities of existing public transport improves public's
standard of living. By providing more spacious seats, entertainment options, and retail shops, public transport can offer both recreational and communal benefits. Correct article usage
the public's
Additionally
, larger and better-equipped transportation hubs can ensure more privacy and comfort for passengers. For instance
, in China, where retail shops are integrated into transportation areas, folks often report a satisfactory travel experience. While
this
approach has its merits, it should not come at the expense of areas lacking mass transit infrastructure.
To conclude
, while
enhancing existing public transit is undeniably important, I firmly believe that constructing new lines
would have a more significant impact on society and the environment. This
approach promotes the use of high-speed trains over personal vehicles, providing quicker access to various destinations and reducing exhaust emissions.Submitted by bita.rezaei7052 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Ensure that both perspectives are balanced in the discussion. Although you presented both viewpoints, delving deeper into the arguments for improving existing public transport would provide a more balanced view.
coherence cohesion
Improve the transitions between paragraphs. For instance, phrases like "On the contrary," or "Conversely," can help to better delineate the shifts in viewpoints.
task achievement
Elaborate on your examples. While the Iranian and Chinese examples are relevant, providing additional details or statistics can make your arguments stronger.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction and conclusion are well-crafted and clearly present your stance and summary.
coherence cohesion
The essay follows a logical structure and the main points are supported with relevant examples.
task achievement
You have clearly articulated your ideas and backed them up with specific examples.