The charts below show one government's spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in Arts events in the same years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

There are two diagrams have been done for the following exploration, where the first one showcases the percentage of authority funding for the cultural sector during the period

from

Change preposition

between

show examples

1995 and 2005, and the second picture provides data about public engagement in cultural events for the same period

accordingly

. So, as can be revealed the most popular direction in the Arts was definitely engagement in the music sphere among the whole society.

To begin

, as a matter of fact, around half of the total

budget

, the government subsidised Music direction in 1995, and just approximately 20 per cent of the

budget

for theatre improvements.

However

, the

budget

sum allocated to the theatre sector sharply increased two-fold over 10 years.

Conversely

, the visual arts investment by the government dwindled twice within ten years and achieved the same output as the literature sphere, around 10 per cent of the

overall

budget

for the calendar year. As regards public involvement in these four Art sectors, the first place in people's participation should be given to the Music sector, where a petty increase has been observed in 10 years, approximately 150 thousand individuals.

Last

but not least, the public contributed more to the theatre events in comparison with the visual arts activities.

To conclude

, the lesser indicator in both tables was in the literature sphere for the whole period, which

as a result

justifies that society unfortunately was not involved in the literature.