living in a country where you have to speak a foreigen language can cause seriouse social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

The debate over the social and practical impacts of having to live in a foreign country with a whole different
language
from yours has sparked considerable controversy.
While
some believe that the effects are quite detrimental in both domains, I completely disagree with
this
notion
due to
some reasons
this
essay
further
elaborates on.
To begin
with, migrating to a new country requires learning the
language
. As
language
is one of the fundamental features of each culture,
this
acquisition brings a deep understanding of the culture as well.
Consequently
, people can enjoy a cultural exchange.
This
interchange often breaks down the stereotypes and leads to greater intimacy between locals and migrants, ultimately enhancing the chance of forging constructive relationships. Take Canada as an example; where is welcoming numerous immigrants from Iran and despite the
language
difference, people have a harmonious community there.
Additionally
,
this
intimacy comes to immigrants' advantage beyond a societal level. By being immersed completely into the destination culture and community, economic and occupational integration becomes much easier;
such
as having more job vacancies.
This
is mainly because they have cultivated the knowledge of how to communicate with them.
Moreover
, they would have more room for educational improvements since their comprehension of the subjects has risen which helps them pursue developments in their career lives even
further
. To illustrate, Italians make up the majority of France's workforce, highlighting their practical development after learning French.
To conclude
,
while
some claim that resiting in a country with a different
language
can result in devastating consequences, I firmly condemn that
this
phenomenon will not only help people foster a cross-cultural understanding but
also
enhance their career paths.
Submitted by bita.rezaei7052 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence and cohesion
Ensure consistency in argumentation: The essay should maintain a consistent viewpoint without contradicting itself. Although the essay overall disagrees with the statement, be careful not to mingle contradictory points.
coherence and cohesion
Transition improvement: Consider employing more varied and sophisticated transition phrases to enhance the flow of the essay.
task achievement
Clear stance: The essay clearly presents a strong viewpoint with supportive arguments and examples.
task achievement
Relevant examples: Examples given, such as the case of Canada and the professional integration of Italians in France, are directly relevant and strengthen the argument.
coherence and cohesion
Logical structure: The essay follows a logical structure with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: