Governments should focus their spending on public services rather than on the art (e.g. Music and painting). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people assert that it is more advisable for the authorities to invest in public services

instead

of art. Owing to the social well-being and the current inclination of residents’ needs,

this

writer totally agrees with

this

statement and will explain it in the following sections. It is straightforward to recognize that public services provide crucial contributions for the whole social sustainability. With improved facilities, increasingly residents are appealed to and will utilize these services more frequently, which leads to an enormous and stable profit for the national budget. In the long term, it is

this

budget

that is

responsible for the economic growth. Take Vietnam as an example, where the majority of healthcare centres have witnessed an innovation recently illustrating that 20% of national income emerges from medical fields.

Subsequently

, education, transportation

as well as

other aspects

also

experience a rise in income. Another key element that must be mentioned is the general preference among the public.

Following

this

statement, the vast of dwellers in these present days are able to enjoy various forms of art conveniently

due to

social networking sites and online shopping. Whenever one has a demand to perform artistic activities, a wide range of tools,

for instance

, brushes, colour patterns, speakers and microphones are always available on the digital market. Because of

this

, no drawbacks have been recorded,

therefore

an investment in

this

aspect is definitely a waste.

Consequently

, there should be a lack of essential budget for other necessities, which gradually harms social stability. In conclusion, it is worth considering to spend on public properties rather than art.

However

,

this

essay has outlined the primary purposes for the approval.