Living in big cities is bad for people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is a common belief that all big enterprises should donate sports and social facilities to the local community. In my perspective, I agree with the statement.

Firstly

, providing social welfare will help them to strengthen the communal bond. One could argue that contributions to society from private companies should be opposed because providing vital supplies,

such

as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, is fundamentally the

government

's responsibility. Relying on corporations for these essential services can lead to unequal access and a focus on profit over public well-being.

For example

, a pharmaceutical company might prioritize developing drugs that generate higher profits rather than addressing urgent public health needs.

Moreover

, when companies step in to fill gaps, it can diminish the

government

's accountability and commitment to its citizens. On that account,

this

will promote their positive image. People will look at that companies are not only very successful but

also

generously take care of those they enrich. The more usually the residents use their providers, the more familiar they are with their logo.

However

, some people oppose the contributions to society and claim that providing vital supplies is the

government

's concern. The taxes have already taken their role. But if we can give just 10% of what we receive from our customers, it will not matter. Ensuring that the

government

manages these vital supplies helps promote equity, transparency, and a focus on the common good.

To conclude

, social donating or not is an arbitrary choice. I think being able to help the community grow is a great thing.