Some cities have vehicle-free days when private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis and metro on vehicle-free days. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
#cities #vehicle-free #cars #trucks #motorcycles #city #center #people #transportation #buses #taxis #metro
There is no denying the fact that with an increasing number of people, transportation problems
also
increase. While
it is a commonly held belief that some cities have vehicle-free days where private cars, trucks, and motorcycles are not allowed to enter the city center
, there is Change the spelling
centre
also
an argument that opposes it. This
essay will analyze this
topic from both points of view and express my opinion.
On one hand, encouraging individuals to use public transportation could significantly reduce greenhouse gases. In other words
, cars are one of the primary contributors to pollution, and reducing their use could help improve our environment. Additionally
, many cities today suffer from traffic congestion, so implementing vehicle-free days could be a potential solution. For instance
, when Japan established its metro system, it minimized crowding on various high streets and reduced noise pollution.
On the other hand
, some people have special needs and cannot easily use buses, and taxis can be costly. Moreover
, banning cars, motorcycles, and trucks could disrupt the daily operations of individuals and businesses. For example
, if you order a pizza, your delivery might be delayed due to
this
law, affecting both customers and businesses.
In conclusion, there are no easy answers to this
question. On balance, however
, I tend to believe that vehicle-free days could help our environment in the long term by reducing pollution and traffic congestion. While
there are some drawbacks, the benefits to the environment and overall
quality of life make it a worthwhile consideration.Submitted by n.a.s.2 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
Your essay is clear and addresses both sides of the argument, which is great. For a higher score, try to develop your ideas more fully. Expand on your examples and provide more detailed explanations or additional points of view.
coherence and cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are well-presented. However, ensure your transitions between ideas and paragraphs flow as smoothly as possible to improve coherence. Use linking words (e.g., however, furthermore) effectively.
coherence and cohesion
Ensure every paragraph focuses on a single clear idea, but explore that idea more profoundly. For instance, the point about traffic congestion could include more statistics or comparisons to other cities where similar measures have succeeded.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay is well-organized with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. This logical structure helps convey your argument effectively.
task response
You provided relevant examples, such as the one about Japan’s metro system, which support your main points well.
task response
Your language is clear and comprehensible, making it easy for the reader to understand your arguments and viewpoints.
Word Count
IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.
A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.
Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.