Both government investment in public transport systems and reductions in public transport ticket prices will help to reduce transport pollution greatly. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Pollution
is a serious global problem
although
that which is caused by traffic is one which can be tackled. I would agree that the primary way of doing
this
would be to invest in the public
transport
infrastructure.
However
, there are
also
other ways.
People
need to commute in order to travel to work
; and
Change the punctuation
, and
;
show examples
many
people
choose to travel to work in private
cars
which
cause
Correct subject-verb agreement
causes
show examples
gridlock in many cities twice a day, and which
also
give
Correct subject-verb agreement
gives
show examples
rise to more serious problems. The fumes from these
cars
cause air
pollution
, resulting in poor quality, harmful air in our cities. These fumes are
also
a major contributor to global warming. If
people
used public
transport
instead
of driving
then
this
problem would be dramatically reduced. Cost and convenience are big factors in
people
’s choice of
transport
.
For
this
reason
Add a comma
reason,
show examples
governments need to invest money to ensure that they have a
transport
system which is more effective than private car ownership.
This
means that the system is reliable and is capable of transporting large numbers of
people
around the city cheaply and quickly. An example of a
well developed
Add a hyphen
well-developed
show examples
system is in Tokyo where millions of
people
rely on public
transport
rather than driving themselves. An alternative solution to the problem is to encourage the use of electric
cars
. We already have the technology to produce electric
cars
which do not produce any fumes so do not result in air
pollution
.
However
, these
cars
are not as popular at present. The government could change
this
by subsidizing car ownership through perhaps offering tax deductions when purchasing the
cars
. They could
also
offer free parking in city centres for electric
cars
. In conclusion, public investment in subsidized public
transport
infrastructure is certainly vital in order to tackle
pollution
.
However
Add a comma
However,
show examples
there are
also
some other alternatives with regards to cleaner technology.
Submitted by jolo9419jmor on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Ensure that all main points are fully supported with relevant specific examples. This will strengthen your arguments and demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.
coherence cohesion
While the essay has a logical structure, consider making the transitions between paragraphs smoother to enhance the overall flow.
introduction conclusion present
The introduction and conclusion are clear and well-presented, effectively framing the discussion.
complete response
The essay provides a comprehensive response to the prompt, addressing multiple aspects of the topic.
supported main points
Main points are clearly articulated and supported, demonstrating a good grasp of the material.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • sustainable transport
  • carbon footprint
  • mass transit
  • subsidization
  • fare reduction
  • environmental impact
  • urban planning
  • public policy
  • commuter behavior
  • infrastructural development
  • economic efficiency
  • equitable access
  • lifestyle shift
  • congestion
What to do next:
Look at other essays: