In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Many people believe that such a ban is justified. Do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary world, the controversy surrounding the importance of public
health
has been a prominent topic. Since a few years ago, smoking has been banned in some public
places
such
as restaurants and museums and a lot of
people
think
this
trend exerts positive effects on societal well-being. From my perspective, I completely agree that smoking should be banned in public areas since it reduces the detrimental impacts on other
people
and
also
discourages
smokers
from smoking.
To begin
with,
people
who advocate the view of banning cigarettes in public
places
have their own justifications.
Firstly
, smoking
bans
have significant effects on public
health
. To be more precise, prohibiting smoking in public
places
reduces exposure to secondhand smoke, which is known to cause various
health
problems
such
as respiratory issues and heart diseases.
For example
, studies have discovered that after Ireland decided to ban smoking in all indoor workplaces, there was a significant decline in lung cancer and other lethal diseases among restaurant and pub workers, leading many other countries to adopt similar measures. Another point to consider is that smoking
bans
create a smoke-free environment and promote a healthier lifestyle by reducing the social acceptability of smoking.
In other words
, prohibiting smoking in public areas forces
smokers
to leave the company of everyone else if they want to have a cigarette. Most
people
dislike feeling ostracized, and
this
can act as an incentive to quit.
For instance
, research has detected that
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
social pressure brought about by smoking
bans
is often cited by ex-
smokers
as one of the important reasons they gave up the habit. In conclusion, despite
people
having different views, I believe that by implementing and enforcing smoking
bans
in public
places
, we can protect public
health
.
This
prevents innocent
people
from developing
health
conditions caused by passive
smokers
and reduces the number of
smokers
.
Submitted by Nastaran_zandy on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

General
While your introduction is solid, consider strengthening the initial thesis statement to make it even clearer. Additionally, make sure to use topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph to clearly indicate the main idea.
Task Achievement
Expand upon the examples provided and ensure they are fully integrated into your discussion. Adding more specific details will improve the comprehensiveness of your arguments.
Coherence and Cohesion
Ensure all ideas are logically connected; utilize transitional phrases to smoothly guide the reader from one point to the next.
Task Response
The essay addresses the prompt effectively and presents a clear stance on the issue.
Coherence and Cohesion
The conclusion succinctly summarizes the key points and restates the main argument, effectively reinforcing your position.
Task Achievement
Relevant examples and evidence are used to support the main arguments, making the essay convincing and well-rounded.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • secondhand smoke
  • prevalence
  • respiratory issues
  • environmental pollution
  • litter
  • healthcare costs
  • smoking-induced illnesses
  • encourage smokers to quit
  • public health improvement
  • justified
  • public spaces
  • exposure
  • non-smokers
  • inconvenience
  • younger populations
What to do next:
Look at other essays: