Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinions are divided on whether a complete ban should be imposed on animal testing on moral grounds or whether it should be maintained
due to
its roles in the development of new therapeutic agents or testing potentially dangerous products. This
essay will examine the logic behind the former view, but I still firmly agree with the latter.
Those who argue that experiments
on animals
should be prohibited may have several arguments. They believe that animals
are also
living creatures with their feelings and emotions like people
. Consequently
, when a testing rabbit is shocked with electronics in drug-researching experiments
, it will experience extreme pain, which is an unaccepted
thing to apply the same action to humans. Replace the word
unacceptable
People
should not treat animals
with physical punishments even when they can withstand regardless these experiments
served for
useful purposes.
Change preposition
apply
Nevertheless
, I believe that these kinds of studies are of great importance and should not be banned. Firstly
, people
are currently not able to simulate the activity of the brain and many other parts needed in disease research. Therefore
, the use of animals
is still essential. Secondly
, due to
the biological similarity between humans and animals
, experimenting on animals
will bring more positive results that
other ways of Correct word choice
than
experiments
. Finally
, many people
believe that the human family can clone many experimental animals
and help them reproduce in large numbers, for long-term research. Therefore
, there will be no situation where the number of animals
is reduced or even extinct.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that animal testing may have certain limitations. However
, I think that this
practice is still necessary and thus
should be allowed for the time being.Submitted by ymohuynh15pharm on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
grammatical
Consider breaking up your sentences if they become too lengthy to avoid potential confusion. For example, instead of saying 'This essay will examine the logic behind the former view, but I still firmly agree with the latter.', you might consider rephrasing it for clarity.
support examples
Provide more detailed examples to support your points. For instance, when discussing the biological similarity between humans and animals, you can reference specific studies or examples that highlight this similarity.
coherence
Your essay demonstrates a well-structured approach with a clear introduction and a strong conclusion, which is crucial for coherence and cohesion.
task completion
You have addressed both sides of the argument, and your position is clearly stated and supported.