Nowadays, experience is more valued in the workplace than knowledge in many countries. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

In today's competitive job market, there is ongoing debate about whether
employees
are more valued for their
experience
or for their
knowledge
.
While
some argue that
experience
is crucial as it equips
employees
with practical
skills
and an understanding of the work environment, others contend that
knowledge
, especially when up-to-date and specialized, is more important as it enables
employees
to perform tasks efficiently and innovate. In my opinion,
while
knowledge
is essential,
experience
tends to be more valuable in the workplace because it encompasses not only technical
skills
but
also
interpersonal abilities and problem-solving competencies. On one hand, proponents of valuing
knowledge
argue that
employees
with a strong educational background and specialized
knowledge
can contribute significantly to a company. These individuals are often up-to-date with the latest developments in their field and can apply theoretical concepts to practical problems.
For example
, a software developer who is well-versed in the latest programming languages and technologies can develop more efficient and innovative solutions compared to someone relying solely on outdated
knowledge
.
Furthermore
, knowledgeable
employees
can often learn new tasks quickly, reducing the need for extensive training programs.
On the other hand
,
experience
provides
employees
with a deep understanding of the practical aspects of their job, which is often acquired over years of working in the industry. Experienced
employees
are familiar with the typical challenges and pitfalls that can arise in their roles, allowing them to navigate complex situations with ease.
For instance
, an experienced project manager is likely to have encountered and resolved various issues in past projects, enabling them to foresee potential problems and take proactive measures.
Additionally
, experienced workers tend to have well-developed soft
skills
,
such
as communication, teamwork, and leadership, which are crucial for a harmonious and productive work environment. In my view,
while
both
knowledge
and
experience
are important,
experience
holds a slight edge because it integrates practical
skills
with theoretical understanding. Companies benefit from
employees
who not only know what needs to be done but
also
have the proven ability to execute tasks effectively and handle unforeseen challenges.
Moreover
, experienced
employees
can mentor less experienced colleagues, fostering a culture of continuous learning and improvement within the organization. In conclusion,
although
knowledge
is vital for innovation and efficiency,
experience
is often more highly valued in the workplace
due to
its practical benefits and the comprehensive skill set it brings. Striking a balance between hiring knowledgeable and experienced
employees
can lead to a more dynamic and successful organization
Submitted by ru.kabiru.biru on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
To improve task response, ensure clarity in explaining why experience tends to be more valuable, perhaps by further highlighting specific situations where practical skills outweigh theoretical knowledge.
coherence cohesion
Further break down main points into distinct paragraphs to enhance clarity and focus. Each paragraph could focus on one main argument with examples supporting it.
coherence cohesion
The essay is well-structured with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, making it easy to follow the argument.
task achievement
The essay provides relevant examples, such as the software developer and project manager, to support the main arguments, which enhances credibility.
coherence cohesion
The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reinforces the writer's opinion, providing a strong end to the essay.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • valued
  • workplace
  • advantages
  • disadvantages
  • experience
  • knowledge
  • mentor
  • colleagues
  • innovation
  • stagnation
  • traditional methods
  • recent graduates
  • theoretical knowledge
  • diversity
  • viewpoints
  • proven ability
  • stability
  • industries
  • technology
  • adaptation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: